All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
To: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	michal.winiarski@intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe: Fix early probe order
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:24:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240425182410.2705061-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> (raw)

( It looks like our initialization functions are in a less than optimal
  order, with additional functions being added in random places. We
  probably need to rename some to follow a pattern so this doesn't happen
  again )

What this series does is to fix the mostly blatant mistakes in the gt
initialization part: since the addition of hwconfig, the WA processing
is not done as early as it should. Future workarounds will require
XE_WA() matching much earlier. Move initialization around and drop dead
code to cover that.

Lucas De Marchi (5):
  drm/xe: Drop __engine_mask
  drm/xe: Drop useless forcewake get/put
  drm/xe: Move xe_gt_init_early() where it belongs
  drm/xe: Move xe_force_wake_init_gt() inside gt initialization
  drm/xe: Move sw-only pcode initialization

 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c   | 16 +++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c       | 15 ++++-----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h |  6 ------
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c  |  3 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pci.c      |  6 +++---
 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-25 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-25 18:24 Lucas De Marchi [this message]
2024-04-25 18:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/xe: Drop __engine_mask Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-29 20:29   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-04-29 20:36     ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-29 21:03       ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-30 15:56         ` Matthew Brost
2024-05-02 11:54           ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-05-02 12:55             ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-05-02 14:12               ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-05-02 17:26                 ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-05-02 20:36                   ` Michal Wajdeczko
2024-05-09  0:02   ` Michał Winiarski
2024-05-13 21:35   ` Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-25 18:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/xe: Drop useless forcewake get/put Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-26  5:19   ` Matthew Brost
2024-04-26 14:45     ` Dong, Zhanjun
2024-05-09  0:03   ` Michał Winiarski
2024-04-25 18:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/xe: Move xe_gt_init_early() where it belongs Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-26 15:52   ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2024-05-09  0:03   ` Michał Winiarski
2024-04-25 18:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/xe: Move xe_force_wake_init_gt() inside gt initialization Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-29 20:25   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-09  0:04   ` Michał Winiarski
2024-04-25 18:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/xe: Move sw-only pcode initialization Lucas De Marchi
2024-04-29 20:24   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-09  0:04   ` Michał Winiarski
2024-04-25 19:16 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Fix early probe order Patchwork
2024-04-25 19:16 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-25 19:17 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-25 19:29 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-25 19:31 ` ✗ CI.Hooks: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-25 19:37 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-04-25 20:36 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:38 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/xe: Fix early probe order (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:39 ` ✓ CI.checkpatch: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:40 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:52 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:55 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 14:56 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2024-04-26 15:23 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-26 19:50 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2024-04-30 14:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] drm/xe: Fix early probe order Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-09  3:54 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/xe: Fix early probe order (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240425182410.2705061-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --to=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.