From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/7] hash: replace existing hash library with cuckoo hash implementation Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:29:53 +0200 Message-ID: <3000440.Zr2t0yRg7U@xps13> References: <1436571020-16252-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1436573936-15956-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> <1436573936-15956-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Pablo de Lara Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B734F5A44 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so53969438wid.1 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:31:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1436573936-15956-2-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-07-11 01:18, Pablo de Lara: > The main change when creating a new table is that the number of entries > per bucket is fixed now, so its parameter is ignored now > (still there to maintain the same parameters structure). Why not rename the "bucket_entries" field to "reserved"? The API of this field has changed (now ignored) so it should be reflected without changing the ABI.