All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: sbehrens@giantdisaster.de, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] xfstest btrfs/316: test send / receive
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:34:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5203D6BF.4040201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375949833-1104-1-git-send-email-list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>

On 8/8/13 3:17 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> These two patches add the announced tests for btrfs send / receive. As
> requested, the fssum tool is now included.
> 
> One drawback is that I'm unable to edit configure.ac or whatever needs
> to be modified in an autotools preferred way. Any hints appreciated,
> preferrably hints containing all the modifications required to introduce
> something like HAVE_SEEK_HOLE.

Other tests in the tree just add:

#ifndef SEEK_DATA
#define SEEK_DATA       3
#define SEEK_HOLE       4
#endif

> I do not want to make modifications to fssum.c here, if that's
> absolutely required (because one /could/ get along using linux/fs.h,
> which is not the way I would like to go), I'd like to have that changed
> in the far-progs repository where fssum.c comes from as well.

Well, unfortunately it breaks the build w/o some change or other,
on older distros:

Building src
    [CC]    fssum
fssum.c: In function 'sum_file_data_permissive':
fssum.c:243: error: 'SEEK_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function)

so this can't be merged as-is.

Adding the 4 lines above to the xfstests copy seems like a pretty obvious fix
to get the tool building and move this along.

Then, to simply skip this test if the kernel we're running on doesn't grok
SEEK_DATA, add:

_require_seek_data_hole

to your new test in patch 2.

Thanks,
-Eric

> --
> v1->v2:
>  - included fssum
>  - test number is now 316 (was 314)
> v2->v3:
>  - added missing -lcrypto to build fssum
>  - removed obsolete change in README now that fssum is included
>  - fixed comment in test/btrfs/316's header (314 -> 316)
> 
> Jan Schmidt (2):
>   xfstests: add fssum tool
>   xfstests btrfs/316: test send / receive
> 
>  .gitignore          |    1 +
>  common/config       |    2 +
>  src/Makefile        |   11 +-
>  src/fssum.c         |  819 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/316     |  113 +++++++
>  tests/btrfs/316.out |    4 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |    1 +
>  7 files changed, 950 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/fssum.c
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/316
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/316.out
> 

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, sbehrens@giantdisaster.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] xfstest btrfs/316: test send / receive
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 12:34:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5203D6BF.4040201@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375949833-1104-1-git-send-email-list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net>

On 8/8/13 3:17 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> These two patches add the announced tests for btrfs send / receive. As
> requested, the fssum tool is now included.
> 
> One drawback is that I'm unable to edit configure.ac or whatever needs
> to be modified in an autotools preferred way. Any hints appreciated,
> preferrably hints containing all the modifications required to introduce
> something like HAVE_SEEK_HOLE.

Other tests in the tree just add:

#ifndef SEEK_DATA
#define SEEK_DATA       3
#define SEEK_HOLE       4
#endif

> I do not want to make modifications to fssum.c here, if that's
> absolutely required (because one /could/ get along using linux/fs.h,
> which is not the way I would like to go), I'd like to have that changed
> in the far-progs repository where fssum.c comes from as well.

Well, unfortunately it breaks the build w/o some change or other,
on older distros:

Building src
    [CC]    fssum
fssum.c: In function 'sum_file_data_permissive':
fssum.c:243: error: 'SEEK_DATA' undeclared (first use in this function)

so this can't be merged as-is.

Adding the 4 lines above to the xfstests copy seems like a pretty obvious fix
to get the tool building and move this along.

Then, to simply skip this test if the kernel we're running on doesn't grok
SEEK_DATA, add:

_require_seek_data_hole

to your new test in patch 2.

Thanks,
-Eric

> --
> v1->v2:
>  - included fssum
>  - test number is now 316 (was 314)
> v2->v3:
>  - added missing -lcrypto to build fssum
>  - removed obsolete change in README now that fssum is included
>  - fixed comment in test/btrfs/316's header (314 -> 316)
> 
> Jan Schmidt (2):
>   xfstests: add fssum tool
>   xfstests btrfs/316: test send / receive
> 
>  .gitignore          |    1 +
>  common/config       |    2 +
>  src/Makefile        |   11 +-
>  src/fssum.c         |  819 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/316     |  113 +++++++
>  tests/btrfs/316.out |    4 +
>  tests/btrfs/group   |    1 +
>  7 files changed, 950 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/fssum.c
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/316
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/316.out
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-08  8:17 [PATCH v3 0/2] xfstest btrfs/316: test send / receive Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08  8:17 ` Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08  8:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] xfstests: add fssum tool Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08  8:17   ` Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08 17:40   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-08 17:40     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-12  1:15     ` ***** SUSPECTED SPAM ***** " Dave Chinner
2013-08-12  1:15       ` Dave Chinner
2013-08-12  2:54       ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-12  2:54         ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-13 15:28         ` Josef Bacik
2013-08-13 15:28           ` Josef Bacik
2013-08-13 16:28           ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-13 16:28             ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-08  8:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] xfstests btrfs/316: test send / receive Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08  8:17   ` Jan Schmidt
2013-08-08 17:45   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-08 17:45     ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-08 17:34 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2013-08-08 17:34   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] xfstest " Eric Sandeen
2013-08-09 15:58 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-08-09 15:58   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5203D6BF.4040201@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.xfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    --cc=sbehrens@giantdisaster.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.