From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932408AbbEWPIM (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 11:08:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:33262 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248AbbEWPIJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2015 11:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: <556097D5.9050103@codeaurora.org> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:08:05 -0500 From: Timur Tabi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnd Bergmann , Hanjun Guo CC: fu.wei@linaro.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, tekkamanninja@gmail.com, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org, linux@roeck-us.net, vgandhi@codeaurora.org, wim@iguana.be, jcm@redhat.com, leo.duran@amd.com, corbet@lwn.net, mark.rutland@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1432197156-16947-7-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <555F4236.7040206@linaro.org> <4095167.UOriXdSu53@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <4095167.UOriXdSu53@wuerfel> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think it's a reasonable assumption that someone will sooner or later > put that hardware into an ARM32 machine, I'm going to have to disagree. If they haven't done it by now, I can't imagine any ARM SOC vendor creating a 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA watchdog in it. I can imagine a vendor trying to repurpose an existing 32-bit ARM SOC for the server market, but that SOC won't have an SBSA watchdog in it. > or run a 32-bit kernel on > a chip that has it. That might happen, but I would be very surprised, and I would need to be convinced that it's useful. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:08:05 -0500 Message-ID: <556097D5.9050103@codeaurora.org> References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1432197156-16947-7-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <555F4236.7040206@linaro.org> <4095167.UOriXdSu53@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4095167.UOriXdSu53@wuerfel> Sender: linux-watchdog-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann , Hanjun Guo Cc: fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, Suravee.Suthikulpanit-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org, linaro-acpi-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org, linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tekkamanninja-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, graeme.gregory-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, al.stone-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, ashwin.chaugule-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org, vgandhi-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org, wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org, jcm-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, leo.duran-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org, corbet-T1hC0tSOHrs@public.gmane.org, mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I think it's a reasonable assumption that someone will sooner or later > put that hardware into an ARM32 machine, I'm going to have to disagree. If they haven't done it by now, I can't imagine any ARM SOC vendor creating a 32-bit ARM SOC with an SBSA watchdog in it. I can imagine a vendor trying to repurpose an existing 32-bit ARM SOC for the server market, but that SOC won't have an SBSA watchdog in it. > or run a 32-bit kernel on > a chip that has it. That might happen, but I would be very surprised, and I would need to be convinced that it's useful. -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html