From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756128AbbFPDTu (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:19:50 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:59617 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756061AbbFPDT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 23:19:27 -0400 Message-ID: <557F95BA.3030501@collabora.co.uk> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 05:19:22 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sudeep Holla , Doug Anderson CC: "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Cooper , Chanho Park , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Peter Chubb , Shuah Khan , Thomas Gleixner , Tomasz Figa , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] irqchip: exynos-combiner: Save IRQ enable set on suspend References: <1434087795-13990-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <557AB00C.5040606@arm.com> <557AC23D.8040602@collabora.co.uk> <557AC85E.5070705@arm.com> <557AD728.7090908@collabora.co.uk> <557B34A7.4090507@collabora.co.uk> <557E82BC.7080203@collabora.co.uk> <557E947B.3030804@arm.com> <557EE890.2050001@collabora.co.uk> <557EEA6C.6020002@arm.com> <557EEDFB.7080502@collabora.co.uk> <557F6677.8080507@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <557F6677.8080507@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Krzysztof, On 06/16/2015 01:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16.06.2015 00:23, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: (...) >>>> To do a more intrusive change, I should better understand the >>>> interactions between the Exynos pinctrl / GPIO, interrupt >>>> combiner and the GIC and in the meantime S2R will continue to >>>> be broken on these platforms unless someone more familiar with >>>> all this could point me in the right direction. >>>> >>> >>> As I said I am fine with this patch for now and I don't want to >>> block it. >>> >> >> Thanks a lot, Krzysztof who is one of the Exynos maintainers has >> also agreed with the patch so hopefully this can land sooner rather >> than later. > > I assume this will go through irqchip tree, right? > That is my assumption as well. I meant the fact that you as an Exynos maintainer thinks $subject is a sensible solution to the issue, would give confidence to the irqchip maintainers to pick this patch soon. > Best regards, Krzysztof > Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 05:19:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] irqchip: exynos-combiner: Save IRQ enable set on suspend In-Reply-To: <557F6677.8080507@samsung.com> References: <1434087795-13990-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <557AB00C.5040606@arm.com> <557AC23D.8040602@collabora.co.uk> <557AC85E.5070705@arm.com> <557AD728.7090908@collabora.co.uk> <557B34A7.4090507@collabora.co.uk> <557E82BC.7080203@collabora.co.uk> <557E947B.3030804@arm.com> <557EE890.2050001@collabora.co.uk> <557EEA6C.6020002@arm.com> <557EEDFB.7080502@collabora.co.uk> <557F6677.8080507@samsung.com> Message-ID: <557F95BA.3030501@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Krzysztof, On 06/16/2015 01:57 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 16.06.2015 00:23, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: (...) >>>> To do a more intrusive change, I should better understand the >>>> interactions between the Exynos pinctrl / GPIO, interrupt >>>> combiner and the GIC and in the meantime S2R will continue to >>>> be broken on these platforms unless someone more familiar with >>>> all this could point me in the right direction. >>>> >>> >>> As I said I am fine with this patch for now and I don't want to >>> block it. >>> >> >> Thanks a lot, Krzysztof who is one of the Exynos maintainers has >> also agreed with the patch so hopefully this can land sooner rather >> than later. > > I assume this will go through irqchip tree, right? > That is my assumption as well. I meant the fact that you as an Exynos maintainer thinks $subject is a sensible solution to the issue, would give confidence to the irqchip maintainers to pick this patch soon. > Best regards, Krzysztof > Best regards, Javier