From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] xen: Clean up Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:36:47 +0100 Message-ID: <5581940F.6020102__31758.4121753045$1434555563$gmane$org@citrix.com> References: <1434551288-14113-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Z5FOx-0002IO-AF for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:37:19 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1434551288-14113-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Julien Grall , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Vrabel , Boris Ostrovsky , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 17/06/15 15:28, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > Thoses patches was originally part of the Xen 64KB series [1]. Although, > I think they can go without waiting the rest of the 64KB series. > > Patch #1-#4 should go through the Xen tree, even though patch #1 touches > multiple part. > > Patch #5-#7 should go through the Block tree. I've applied all of these to for-linus-4.2, thanks. Including the block ones since they were trivial and not block-related. David