All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: "Andres G. Aragoneses" <knocte@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] git-checkout.txt: Document "git checkout <pathspec>" better
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:43:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581A3A3.1070908@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqd20u48at.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On 2015-06-17 18.19, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Yes, but "Switch branchs or discard local changes" still does not
>>> describe "git checkout HEAD^^^ -- file.txt" (restore to an old state,
>>> but does not switch branch) or "git checkout -- file.txt" (get from the
>>> index).
>>
>> You are right, especially when file.txt does not have any change
>> relative to HEAD, there is no "discarding" going on.  You are
>> actively introducing a change to an unchanged file by checking
>> contents out of a different revision.
>>
>>> To me, "discard local changes" imply that there will be no uncommited
>>> changes on the files implied in the command after the operation.
>>
>> Yup.
> 
> What was discussed in this thread sounded suspiciously familiar ;-).
> 
> Unfortunately "overwrite changes in the working tree" and "discard
> local changes" are equally bad.  As it does not say overwrite with
> what, we invite the original confusion that triggered these threads
> if the reader thought an equally useful but different "overwrites
> with result of merging your local changes to the pristine" (similar
> to what "checkout -m" does) would happen.
> 
> At least, "restore working tree files" without saying "restoring
> them to what state?" is much less likely to cause such a confusion.
> 
> So perhaps
> 
>     git-checkout - Switch branches or restore working tree files
> 
> in the headline, and then explain "restore to what state" in the
> description?
I'm not sure if the "restore" is always the right thing to describe:
'git checkout <commit> -- <path>'
will "copy" the version from another commit into the workspace.

My v3 will probably use the original line:
git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree

(and improve the description)

git-checkout - Checkout a branch or paths to the working tree

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-17  7:54 [PATCH v2] git-checkout.txt: Document "git checkout <pathspec>" better Torsten Bögershausen
2015-06-17  9:58 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-17 10:54   ` Matthieu Moy
2015-06-17 11:47     ` Andres G. Aragoneses
2015-06-17 11:54       ` Matthieu Moy
2015-06-17 11:56         ` Andres G. Aragoneses
2015-06-17 12:17           ` Matthieu Moy
2015-06-17 15:29             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 16:12               ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-06-17 16:19               ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 16:43                 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2015-06-17 17:24                   ` Matthieu Moy
2015-06-17 17:53                     ` Andres G. Aragoneses
2015-06-17 19:24                       ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 19:23                     ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-17 19:29                       ` Torsten Bögershausen
2015-06-17 19:58                         ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-18  0:37                           ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-18  1:07                             ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-18  7:00                       ` Matthieu Moy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5581A3A3.1070908@web.de \
    --to=tboegi@web.de \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=knocte@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.