From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id CA8B4E00A5B; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:25:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3035EE009C5 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A87F9600118F; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:25:00 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1434569100; bh=wF2Jycbn/7PozQR3O4WJqQJZQyxCUWlJnuD2IWWMqLI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qgsVe3c8cpX+sHsvENes2sxU2ULCKThM5t93mfgUiXiRnDKKyyQ8CCfaWNq3nOXH0 0OF5/5paZvbNaCjjH42hxSDEUPJBbp873ukmFHeCTriDawNDiYt4G229x74f/GqsaP o7M1heQUmwT+uxUWWs0mHfVR7epaDwcHfxKNhups= Message-ID: <5581C98C.8060802@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:25:00 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1434564146-11377-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1434564146-11377-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5581BC50.5020504@mail.bg> <5581BE95.9060009@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/4] linux-fslc-mx6 (3.14-1.0.x): Add recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:25:05 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 06/17/2015 09:39 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> On 06/17/2015 09:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This recipe provides the FSL Community's i.MX6 Linux which is a Linux >>>>> kernel based on Freescale 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA release, used by FSL >>>>> Community BSP in order to provide support for i.MX6 based platforms. >>>>> >>>>> The fork includes the official Linux kernel stable updates, backported >>>>> features and fixes coming from the vendors, kernel community or FSL >>>>> Community itself. >>>>> >>>>> This version is based on 3.14.44 stable release and includes following >>>>> changes on top of both kernels: >>>>> >>>>> 9e71c2c ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable kexec support >>>>> 3b15ffa Revert "net: fec: fix the warning found by dma debug" >>>>> 3183696 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fixup runtime PM conditions during >>>>> ->probe() >>>>> 434d1b2 ARM: 8338/1: kexec: Relax SMP validation to improve DT >>>>> compatibility >>>>> 33bb67d gpio: generic: clamp retured value to [0,1] >>>>> 192f32d ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC >>>>> support >>>>> is disabled >>>>> >>>>> Change-Id: I0d5b21a0381c64b323c73cded73a93a4f218f50d >>>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador >>>>> --- >>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig | 414 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb | 16 + >>>>> 2 files changed, 430 insertions(+) >>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig >>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I personally think that the naming of this kernel will cause confusion. >>> >>> >>> Any suggestion? >> >> >> Anything that doesn't contain "fslc", like "linux-fsl", "linux-imx", >> "linux-imx6" or similar. >> >> What do you think? > > I think it is important to provide the credit to fslc as this is not > an fsl initiative or a generic imx kernel. I think the credit already goes everywhere - source code license, author's rights in each file, etc. To be honest, I was thinking mostly about functionality and not about credit. So, in terms of functionality this kernel sits somewhere between mainline and FSL releases, is that correct? Regards, Nikolay