From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EABDEE00A5B; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:27:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575CBE009C5 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BDAC60010C8; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:27:28 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1434569248; bh=zICuSZSwjsWquqR0vF6AYg6MN/gJXdDtRdrsdgtxXPQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IFuyHV50xI1U0rpju/mr08bPsFhhbicKOlsY4K5TmdLwYgVo0LMHXJRukSwjSaZ13 N7E66PCaTnDBSCFB/1VRoyxru3mHP9rWoFwi2u492rTrBZJTkGVoS/QBXcy3xhgO1x c7ip0LvgGVDZfnc3DWL+PY5VuasFZCWc4dc/stEg= Message-ID: <5581CA1F.3080203@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 22:27:27 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1434564146-11377-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1434564146-11377-2-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5581BD6A.40905@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/4] fsl-default-providers.inc: Move content to imx-base.inc and mxs-base.inc X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:27:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 06/17/2015 09:38 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: >> On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > ... >>> # Set specific make target and binary suffix >>> +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_u-boot ??= "u-boot-fslc" >>> +PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/bootloader ??= "u-boot-fslc" >> >> >> We had a discussion about why should both u-boot and virtual/bootloader >> to be set at the same value, at the same time. My experience with >> Dizzy/Fido shows that I can usually get away with only setting the >> u-boot preferred provider. Is it possible at some point to have only >> one of these variables? > > Yes; this needs to be cleaned up but I didn't find the time to do so. > If you want to jump in, be my guest ;-) My question was whether you added both variables by knowing that this will be the long-term solution, or it was just inherited as code from the current recipes :D. Thanks for clarifying this. Regards, Nikolay