From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id BD34DE00A5B; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:10:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [193.201.172.118 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (picmaster[at]mail.bg) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [193.201.172.118]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E84E00957 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.62] (unknown [93.152.143.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9E9F6003F01; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:10:47 +0300 (EEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1434647447; bh=VLAdYJnoswrje1FQUAL3V+I6w62Xal/sx7crXUAQ1Qw=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gbwj2W0qjqnG+0KysQaETnr8y5C2zLevycA6G13+/t9Flxwyzv7kZZdomoHajRa50 iMOmuZksDSqg1WHgMc5gHocutkDvZnh1gD5hUQxP46StwvmdnSeh1+gWQwHs1eF0Iw 7JiZA+JUJjnXATCQFU5not+dPr2WHqUEQcZeKVJg= Message-ID: <5582FB97.5060300@mail.bg> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:10:47 +0300 From: Nikolay Dimitrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Daiane Angolini References: <1434564146-11377-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1434564146-11377-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5581BC50.5020504@mail.bg> <5581BE95.9060009@mail.bg> <5581C98C.8060802@mail.bg> In-Reply-To: Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/4] linux-fslc-mx6 (3.14-1.0.x): Add recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 17:10:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 06/18/2015 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: [snip] > > linux-fslc_4.0.bb linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb > > or > > linux-fslc_4.0.bb linux-fslc_3.14-1.0.x-mx6.bb Understood. Then here's my proposal, which I hope aligns with what you already outlined: 1. Drop SOC name from the provider name ...in order to have more SOCs benefit from the same efforts. First, patches in non-soc-specific common areas can be reused as-is (ext4 patches anyone :D?), and second, it would be great to have 1 repository where all these efforts are concentrated, not separate for each separate SoC (also, there are drivers for IP-blocks which are reused 1:1 across SoCs). 2. Make sure the provider name doesn't contain a delimited string of "fsl", "imx" or "mx" ... to make sure the provider is not confused with the FSL provider, and to give due credit to the upstream + community efforts. 3. Drop the GA release version from the provider name ...for several reasons: - it will limit the ability to merge patches from different GA releases (if/when such need arises) - to not confuse it with FSL GA releases - sooner or later due to upstream patches merged this code will be further and further away from the FSL release point. So I think that a provider name like... linux-fslc_3.14.28 linux-fslc_3.17.4 linux-fslc_4.0 ...seems practical. (I can only make the educated guess that "fslc" = "Freescale community", but "fsl-community" really seems quite long). Regards, Nikolay