From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:30:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] arm: simplify MMIO dispatching In-Reply-To: <55817EEA.9060402@arm.com> References: <1434540121-21283-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1434540121-21283-7-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <55816C9F.1090500@arm.com> <55817B07.8010502@arm.com> <55817EEA.9060402@arm.com> Message-ID: <558AB0DD.1070704@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Will, do you want me to respin the whole series to address the remaining minor comments in the last four patches or do you want to take patch 01-06 already (which I think Marc has already agreed upon)? Then I would just send an updated version of the remaining patches. Cheers, Andre. .... > No, that's fine. > > I just wondered what was the rational behind having the > arm_addr_in_pci_region() call there. It might have guarded something, > but if you're absolutely positive that this doesn't cause a regression, > that's OK with me. > > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier > > M. > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] arm: simplify MMIO dispatching Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:30:05 +0100 Message-ID: <558AB0DD.1070704@arm.com> References: <1434540121-21283-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <1434540121-21283-7-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com> <55816C9F.1090500@arm.com> <55817B07.8010502@arm.com> <55817EEA.9060402@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434D056DF1 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:18:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGkOP4sxgRE7 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:18:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.50]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC2B56DF3 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:18:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <55817EEA.9060402@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Will Deacon Cc: Marc Zyngier , "penberg@kernel.org" , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi Will, do you want me to respin the whole series to address the remaining minor comments in the last four patches or do you want to take patch 01-06 already (which I think Marc has already agreed upon)? Then I would just send an updated version of the remaining patches. Cheers, Andre. .... > No, that's fine. > > I just wondered what was the rational behind having the > arm_addr_in_pci_region() call there. It might have guarded something, > but if you're absolutely positive that this doesn't cause a regression, > that's OK with me. > > Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier > > M. >