From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750864AbbF2TRP (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:17:15 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:40200 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751036AbbF2TRH (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:17:07 -0400 Message-ID: <559199AB.8090106@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:16:59 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fu Wei , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org CC: Wei Fu , G Gregory , Al Stone , Hanjun Guo , Timur Tabi , Ashwin Chaugule , Arnd Bergmann , Vipul Gandhi , Wim Van Sebroeck , Jon Masters , Leo Duran , Jon Corbet , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , rjw@rjwysocki.net, dyoung@redhat.com, panand@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] Watchdog: introduce ARM SBSA watchdog driver References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1435068994-13526-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/29/2015 09:53 AM, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > Any suggestion on this v6 patchset, for now , I only got : Problem is that each version of your patchset tends to introduce substantially new or different functionality, meaning the review has to pretty much start from scratch. Right now I just don't have time to do that, so you'll have to be a bit patient. Guenter