From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 17:10:15 +0200
Subject: [Cocci] release: 1.0.1: Checking installation dependencies
In-Reply-To: <5593A5BE.7090308@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1506180654120.2663@hadrien>
 <55845D5F.6010408@users.sourceforge.net>
 <55852F40.4000502@users.sourceforge.net> <5588106D.7020305@gmail.com>
 <558818EE.8000900@users.sourceforge.net> <55892843.7070001@gmail.com>
 <55892D6D.5000001@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20150623172811.GU11147@wotan.suse.de> <5593A5BE.7090308@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <559402D7.7020203@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> The pattern lib64 is not used at all in my version of coccinelle's source code

How do you think about to recheck make files and related build scripts?


> and when I installed coccinelle on openSUSE it did end up in lib rather than lib64.

Which run time environment did you try out for this software installation test?


> Do any of you have an idea why coccinelle was installed in lib64?

Yes, in principle.   ;-)

How do you distinguish 64 bit systems nowadays?

Regards,
Markus