From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v7][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:53:17 +0800 Message-ID: <559E529D.8010707@intel.com> References: <1436420047-25356-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <1436420047-25356-11-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <20150709092019.GC11671@zion.uk.xensource.com> <559E426A.6010009@intel.com> <21918.20230.535183.800193@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <21918.20230.535183.800193@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2015/7/9 18:37, Ian Jackson wrote: > Chen, Tiejun writes ("Re: [v7][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy"): >> "Note I also mask patch #10 Acked by Wei Liu, Ian Jackson and Ian >> Campbell. ( If I'm wrong just let me know at this point. )..." > > For future reference, if I am acking something I am always completely > clear about that. Ambiguous statements, or statements of intent, are > not in themselves acks. Okay I'll keep this in my mind. And as I replied to Wei, I already removed those sentences in local tree. > > I have not yet acked these patches in this case. I will review them > later today. > Thanks Tiejun