From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaroslav Kysela Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ALSA: core: add report of max dma burst Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:28:31 +0200 Message-ID: <55A1604F.3070108@perex.cz> References: <1436350236-17509-1-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <1436350236-17509-4-git-send-email-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> <55A1565C.70004@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail1.perex.cz (mail1.perex.cz [77.48.224.245]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD462605C2 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 20:28:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <55A1565C.70004@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: "Alexander E. Patrakov" , Takashi Iwai , Pierre-Louis Bossart Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org >>> + unsigned int max_dma_burst; /* R: max in-flight bytes, indicates buffering before hw_ptr */ I'm not sure if we should name fields like dma in the abstract ioctl layer. The words in the comment seems more appropriate or just remove dma and keep only max_burst. Thanks, Jaroslav -- Jaroslav Kysela Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.