From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [v7][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:47:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A35EFA.9030304@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLBxZbZkS3ZRyTC-g07MYNCDDm4Tb3rCB2oJRzx3qVHxxEvPA@mail.gmail.com>
> Thanks for this; a few more comments...
>
Thanks for your time.
>> @@ -1577,9 +1578,15 @@ int iommu_do_pci_domctl(
>> seg = machine_sbdf >> 16;
>> bus = PCI_BUS(machine_sbdf);
>> devfn = PCI_DEVFN2(machine_sbdf);
>> + flag = domctl->u.assign_device.flag;
>> + if ( flag > XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED )
>
> This is not a blocker, but a stylistic comment: I would have inverted
> the bitmask here, as that's conceptually what you're checking. I
> won't make this a blocker for going in.
What about this?
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
index 6e23fc6..17a4206 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c
@@ -1579,7 +1579,7 @@ int iommu_do_pci_domctl(
bus = PCI_BUS(machine_sbdf);
devfn = PCI_DEVFN2(machine_sbdf);
flag = domctl->u.assign_device.flag;
- if ( flag > XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED )
+ if ( flag & ~XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_MASK )
{
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
diff --git a/xen/include/public/domctl.h b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
index bca25c9..07549a4 100644
--- a/xen/include/public/domctl.h
+++ b/xen/include/public/domctl.h
@@ -480,6 +480,7 @@ struct xen_domctl_assign_device {
} u;
/* IN */
#define XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED 1
+#define XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_MASK 0x1
uint32_t flag; /* flag of assigned device */
};
typedef struct xen_domctl_assign_device xen_domctl_assign_device_t;
>
>> @@ -1898,7 +1899,14 @@ static int intel_iommu_add_device(u8 devfn, struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> PCI_BUS(bdf) == pdev->bus &&
>> PCI_DEVFN2(bdf) == devfn )
>> {
>> - ret = rmrr_identity_mapping(pdev->domain, 1, rmrr);
>> + /*
>> + * Here means we're add a device to the hardware domain
>> + * so actually RMRR is always reserved on e820 so either
>> + * of flag is fine for hardware domain and here we'd like
>> + * to pass XEN_DOMCTL_DEV_RDM_RELAXED.
>> + */
>
> Sorry I didn't give feedback on your comment before. I don't find it
> clear enough; I'd suggest something like this:
>
> "iommu_add_device() is only called for the hardware domain (see
> xen/drivers/passthrough/pci.c:pci_add_device()). Since RMRRs are
> always reserved in the e820 map for the hardware domain, there
> shouldn't be a conflict."
Loos good and thanks.
>
> I also said that if we went with anything other than STRICT that we'd
> need to check to make sure that the domain really was the hardware
> domain before proceeding, in case the assumption that pdev->domain ==
> hardware_domain ever changed. (Perhaps with an ASSERT -- Jan, what do
> you think?)
Sounds reasonable.
>
> Also, passing in RELAXED in locations where the flag is completely
> ignored (such as when removing mappings) doesn't really make any
> sense.
>
> On the whole I think it would be better if you removed the RELAXED
> flag for both removals and for hardware domains.
>
Just as I said in another email I agreed your STRICT way.
Thanks
Tiejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-09 5:33 [v7][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 01/16] xen: introduce XENMEM_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 02/16] xen/vtd: create RMRR mapping Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 03/16] xen/passthrough: extend hypercall to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-10 13:26 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-10 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-10 15:07 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-13 6:37 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 5:57 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 6:47 ` Chen, Tiejun [this message]
2015-07-13 8:57 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 10:46 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-14 10:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 11:30 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-14 11:45 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 13:25 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 04/16] xen: enable XENMEM_memory_map in hvm Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 05/16] hvmloader: get guest memory map into memory_map[] Tiejun Chen
2015-07-10 13:49 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-13 7:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges Tiejun Chen
2015-07-13 13:12 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 6:39 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 10:54 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 11:50 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 0:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 4:27 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 8:59 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 9:10 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 9:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 10:34 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 11:25 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 11:34 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 13:56 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-15 16:14 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 2:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 9:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 10:01 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 11:05 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-15 11:20 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 12:43 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-15 13:23 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 11:24 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 11:38 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-15 11:27 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 11:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 8:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 9:04 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-15 12:57 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-15 13:40 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-15 14:00 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 15:19 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 07/16] hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table Tiejun Chen
2015-07-13 13:35 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 5:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:32 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 10:22 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 10:48 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-15 16:00 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 1:58 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 9:41 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-09 5:33 ` [v7][PATCH 08/16] tools/libxc: Expose new hypercall xc_reserved_device_memory_map Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 09/16] tools: extend xc_assign_device() to support rdm reservation policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 10/16] tools: introduce some new parameters to set rdm policy Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 9:20 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-09 9:44 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 10:37 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-09 10:53 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 18:02 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-10 0:46 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 11/16] tools/libxl: detect and avoid conflicts with RDM Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 9:11 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-09 9:41 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 18:14 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-10 3:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-10 10:14 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 9:19 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 12/16] tools: introduce a new parameter to set a predefined rdm boundary Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 18:14 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 13/16] libxl: construct e820 map with RDM information for HVM guest Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 18:17 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-10 5:40 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-10 9:18 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 9:47 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 10:15 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-14 5:44 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 7:42 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-14 8:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-10 10:15 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 14/16] xen/vtd: enable USB device assignment Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 15/16] xen/vtd: prevent from assign the device with shared rmrr Tiejun Chen
2015-07-13 13:41 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 1:42 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-14 9:19 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-09 5:34 ` [v7][PATCH 16/16] tools: parse to enable new rdm policy parameters Tiejun Chen
2015-07-09 18:23 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-10 6:05 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-10 10:23 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-13 9:31 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 9:40 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 9:55 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-13 10:17 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-13 17:08 ` Ian Jackson
2015-07-14 1:29 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-10 14:50 ` [v7][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR George Dunlap
2015-07-10 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 7:55 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 8:03 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 8:08 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 8:13 ` Chen, Tiejun
2015-07-16 8:26 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 9:27 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-16 9:59 ` George Dunlap
2015-07-16 8:30 ` Ian Campbell
2015-07-16 8:46 ` Wei Liu
2015-07-16 9:45 ` Lars Kurth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A35EFA.9030304@intel.com \
--to=tiejun.chen@intel.com \
--cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.