From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754910AbbGNJy2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:54:28 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:61046 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753906AbbGNJy0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:54:26 -0400 Message-ID: <55A4DB56.6070504@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:14 +0800 From: Xishi Qiu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Hocko CC: Xuzhichuang , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Songjiangtao (mygirlsjt)" , "Zhangwei (FF)" Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] OOM Killer is invoked while the system still has much memory References: <6D317A699782EA4DB9A0E6266C9219696CA2B3BC@SZXEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20150714081521.GA17711@dhcp22.suse.cz> <55A4CB68.5060906@huawei.com> <20150714090025.GA17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> <55A4D300.5030704@huawei.com> <20150714092842.GB17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20150714092842.GB17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.25.179] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2015/7/14 17:28, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 14-07-15 17:14:40, Xishi Qiu wrote: >> On 2015/7/14 17:00, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >>> On Tue 14-07-15 16:42:16, Xishi Qiu wrote: >>>> On 2015/7/14 16:15, Michal Hocko wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue 14-07-15 07:11:34, Xuzhichuang wrote: >>> [...] >>>>>> Jul 10 12:33:03 BMS_CNA04 kernel: [18136514.138968] DMA32: 188513*4kB 29459*8kB 2*16kB 2*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 990396kB >>>>> >>>>> Moreover your allocation request was oreder 2 and you do not have much >>>>> memory there because most of the free memory is in order-0-2. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Michal, >>>> >>>> order=2 -> alloc 16kb memory, and DMA32 still has 2*16kB 2*32kB 1*64kB 1*512kB, >>>> so you mean this large buddy block was reclaimed during the moment of oom and >>>> print, right? >>> >>> Not really. Those high order blocks are inaccessible for your GFP_KERNEL >>> allocation. See __zone_watermark_ok. >>> >> >> I know, some of them are from reserved memory(MIGRATE_RESERVE), right? > > No. The watermark is calculated per order. And you have almost all the > free memory in the lower orders. From a quick glance it seems that even > order-1 allocations wouldn't fit into min watermark. So we can't alloc memory because it doesn't fit the watermark, and the large buddy blocks maybe from reserved, or maybe not, right? Thanks, Xishi Qiu From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FE49003C8 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:59:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by oibn4 with SMTP id n4so3016587oib.3 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com. [119.145.14.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r133si447285oib.79.2015.07.14.02.59.39 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:59:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A4DB56.6070504@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:50:14 +0800 From: Xishi Qiu MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] OOM Killer is invoked while the system still has much memory References: <6D317A699782EA4DB9A0E6266C9219696CA2B3BC@SZXEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com> <20150714081521.GA17711@dhcp22.suse.cz> <55A4CB68.5060906@huawei.com> <20150714090025.GA17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> <55A4D300.5030704@huawei.com> <20150714092842.GB17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20150714092842.GB17660@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Michal Hocko Cc: Xuzhichuang , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "Songjiangtao (mygirlsjt)" , "Zhangwei (FF)" On 2015/7/14 17:28, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 14-07-15 17:14:40, Xishi Qiu wrote: >> On 2015/7/14 17:00, Michal Hocko wrote: >> >>> On Tue 14-07-15 16:42:16, Xishi Qiu wrote: >>>> On 2015/7/14 16:15, Michal Hocko wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue 14-07-15 07:11:34, Xuzhichuang wrote: >>> [...] >>>>>> Jul 10 12:33:03 BMS_CNA04 kernel: [18136514.138968] DMA32: 188513*4kB 29459*8kB 2*16kB 2*32kB 1*64kB 0*128kB 0*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 990396kB >>>>> >>>>> Moreover your allocation request was oreder 2 and you do not have much >>>>> memory there because most of the free memory is in order-0-2. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Michal, >>>> >>>> order=2 -> alloc 16kb memory, and DMA32 still has 2*16kB 2*32kB 1*64kB 1*512kB, >>>> so you mean this large buddy block was reclaimed during the moment of oom and >>>> print, right? >>> >>> Not really. Those high order blocks are inaccessible for your GFP_KERNEL >>> allocation. See __zone_watermark_ok. >>> >> >> I know, some of them are from reserved memory(MIGRATE_RESERVE), right? > > No. The watermark is calculated per order. And you have almost all the > free memory in the lower orders. From a quick glance it seems that even > order-1 allocations wouldn't fit into min watermark. So we can't alloc memory because it doesn't fit the watermark, and the large buddy blocks maybe from reserved, or maybe not, right? Thanks, Xishi Qiu -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org