All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@bitdefender.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: jun.nakajima@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
	wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
	stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, eddie.dong@intel.com,
	Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	tlengyel@novetta.com, keir@xen.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] xen/vm_event: Deny register writes if refused by vm_event reply
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:37:33 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A51EAD.7090000@bitdefender.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55A51E1D0200007800090AF4@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 07/14/2015 03:35 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h
>> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@
>>   * VM_EVENT_FLAG_SET_EMUL_READ_DATA are set, only the latter will be honored).
>>   */
>>  #define VM_EVENT_FLAG_SET_EMUL_READ_DATA (1 << 5)
>> + /*
>> +  * Deny completion of the operation that triggered the event.
>> +  * Currently only useful for MSR, CR0, CR3 and CR4 write events.
>> +  */
>> +#define VM_EVENT_FLAG_DENY               (1 << 6)
> 
> Wouldn't this want adding to the get-capabilities sub-op too?

Actually, no (sorry for rushing with the answer before), the monitor.c
capabilities issue refers to main event types, whereas this is a
response flag.

 45 static inline uint32_t get_capabilities(struct domain *d)
 46 {
 47     uint32_t capabilities = 0;
 48
 49     /*
 50      * At the moment only Intel HVM domains are supported. However,
event
 51      * delivery could be extended to AMD and PV domains.
 52      */
 53     if ( !is_hvm_domain(d) || !cpu_has_vmx )
 54         return capabilities;
 55
 56     capabilities = (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_WRITE_CTRLREG) |
 57                    (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_MOV_TO_MSR) |
 58                    (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_SOFTWARE_BREAKPOINT) |
 59                    (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_GUEST_REQUEST);
 60
 61     /* Since we know this is on VMX, we can just call the hvm func */
 62     if ( hvm_is_singlestep_supported() )
 63         capabilities |= (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_SINGLESTEP);
 64
 65     return capabilities;
 66 }

So if we have the (1 << XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_WRITE_CTRLREG) and (1
<< XEN_DOMCTL_MONITOR_EVENT_MOV_TO_MSR), that also means we can deny
those writes (by setting the VM_EVENT_FLAG_DENY in the vm_event
response), no additional checks are necessary.


Thanks,
Razvan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-14 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 17:14 [PATCH V5 0/3] Vm_event memory introspection helpers Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-13 17:14 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] xen/mem_access: Support for memory-content hiding Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-13 17:32   ` Lengyel, Tamas
2015-07-13 17:36     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 12:22   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 13:26     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 13:37       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 13:41         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-13 17:14 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] xen/vm_event: Support for guest-requested events Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-13 17:14 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] xen/vm_event: Deny register writes if refused by vm_event reply Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 12:35   ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 13:45     ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 14:41       ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 15:04         ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 15:55           ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 16:25             ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 14:37     ` Razvan Cojocaru [this message]
2015-07-14 10:50 ` [PATCH V5 0/3] Vm_event memory introspection helpers Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 11:45   ` Razvan Cojocaru
2015-07-14 11:53     ` Jan Beulich
2015-07-14 13:08     ` Ian Campbell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55A51EAD.7090000@bitdefender.com \
    --to=rcojocaru@bitdefender.com \
    --cc=Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=eddie.dong@intel.com \
    --cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tlengyel@novetta.com \
    --cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.