From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v7][PATCH 06/16] hvmloader/pci: skip reserved ranges Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:05:25 +0800 Message-ID: <55A71165.4090307@intel.com> References: <1436420047-25356-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <1436420047-25356-7-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com> <55A3D5600200007800090330@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A4AE88.2000200@intel.com> <55A4F2270200007800090834@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A4EA54.60708@intel.com> <55A5138F0200007800090A71@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A5AF6F.1050305@intel.com> <55A5E122.7030203@intel.com> <55A6374E02000078000911EC@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A6210E.8080406@intel.com> <55A64386020000780009132E@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A6374F.6030901@intel.com> <55A65F620200007800091472@mail.emea.novell.com> <55A6454D.2000201@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jan Beulich , Keir Fraser List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2015/7/16 0:14, George Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 2:56 PM, George Dunlap > wrote: >> Would it be possible, on a collision, to have one last "stab" at >> allocating the BAR somewhere else, without relocating memory (or >> relocating any other BARs)? At very least then an administrator could >> work around this kind of thing by setting the mmio_hole larger in the >> domain config. > > If it's not possible to have this last-ditch relocation effort, then Could you take a look at the original patch #06 ? Although Jan thought that is complicated, that is really one version that I can refine in current time slot. > yes, I'd be OK with just disabling the device for the time being. > Just let me send out new patch series based this idea. We can continue discuss this over there but we also need to further review other remaining comments based on a new revision. Thanks Tiejun