From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754243AbbHFBuE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:50:04 -0400
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:46114 "EHLO
	szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753285AbbHFBuC (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:50:02 -0400
Message-ID: <55C2BC01.3010000@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:44:33 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
CC: pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
        Xia Kaixu <xiakaixu@huawei.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering.  was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT
 PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs
References: <20150731203125.GB16700@kernel.org> <55BED407.9090009@huawei.com> <20150803150728.GA3864@kernel.org> <20150803151905.GE3864@kernel.org> <DC6736CC-5186-4A36-985A-A3F8BA142AA2@163.com> <20150803161116.GB5498@kernel.org> <20150803194917.GE5498@kernel.org> <55C04D60.2050101@huawei.com> <55C0966B.5020801@huawei.com> <20150804155557.GB3126@kernel.org> <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.111.66.109]
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Arnaldo,

Have you tried 'perf test BPF'? Is that okay on your environment?

Thank you.

On 2015/8/5 0:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:55:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:39:39PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
>>>    https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf
>   
>> Ok, but I am checking patch by patch to see if the changes I made are
>> kept, and for the first one, it wasn't (the second one is the cset in
> ouch, you now use a branch named "ebpf" whereas before you used
> "perf/ebpf-for-acme" before, that was what I was looking at now :-\
>
> After I realised that, yes, you kept my changes in the "ebpf" branch,
> looking there now.
>
> - Arnaldo