From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751543AbbINSFY (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:05:24 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47549 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355AbbINSFW (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:05:22 -0400 Message-ID: <55F70C5B.8040508@arm.com> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:05:15 +0100 From: Marc Zyngier Organization: ARM Ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fu Wei , Thomas Gleixner CC: Hanjun Guo , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Wei Fu , G Gregory , Al Stone , Arnd Bergmann , Guenter Roeck , Vipul Gandhi , Wim Van Sebroeck , Jon Masters , Leo Duran , Jonathan Corbet , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Rafael Wysocki , dyoung@redhat.com, panand@redhat.com, Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-9-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <55DEFC54.4090904@linaro.org> <55DF025F.2050102@linaro.org> <55DF1257.9090303@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/08/15 14:51, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Thomas, Hanjun > > On 27 August 2015 at 21:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/29/236 >>>> >>>> If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing >>>> for clock declare. >> >> Yes. > > Thanks > >> >>> Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this >>> patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream. >> >> Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and >> decided to rant about it :) > > OK, good idea, this patch will be improve by DECLARE_ thing, then upstream. > drop this from this patchset. > > Great thanks for your help You probably want to keep an eye on this: https://lwn.net/Articles/657238/ which implements the necessary infrastructure. I'd appreciate if you could give it a go to find out if it works for you. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Zyngier Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:05:15 +0100 Message-ID: <55F70C5B.8040508@arm.com> References: <=fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1440435683-7343-9-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <55DEFC54.4090904@linaro.org> <55DF025F.2050102@linaro.org> <55DF1257.9090303@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-watchdog-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Fu Wei , Thomas Gleixner Cc: Hanjun Guo , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Linaro ACPI Mailman List , linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, LKML , linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Wei Fu , G Gregory , Al Stone , Arnd Bergmann , Guenter Roeck , Vipul Gandhi , Wim Van Sebroeck , Jon Masters , Leo Duran , Jonathan Corbet , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Rafael Wysocki , dyoung-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, panand-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Daniel Lezcano List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 27/08/15 14:51, Fu Wei wrote: > Hi Thomas, Hanjun > > On 27 August 2015 at 21:40, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/29/236 >>>> >>>> If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing >>>> for clock declare. >> >> Yes. > > Thanks > >> >>> Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this >>> patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream. >> >> Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and >> decided to rant about it :) > > OK, good idea, this patch will be improve by DECLARE_ thing, then upstream. > drop this from this patchset. > > Great thanks for your help You probably want to keep an eye on this: https://lwn.net/Articles/657238/ which implements the necessary infrastructure. I'd appreciate if you could give it a go to find out if it works for you. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html