From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36374)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1ZbuQZ-00043Y-Iw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:54:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1ZbuQV-0005V6-Ba
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:53:59 -0400
Message-ID: <55F85B30.4080601@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:53:52 +0300
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1433424607-3429-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com>	<CAFEAcA-HAZRJ8jBvWM8tnN-BkYuzBtToPFgzTNEU8oxtqmUtfQ@mail.gmail.com>	<87twu5z7px.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>	<CAFEAcA8ukn66k8OaBFmn08kPRPa1q2HUrOwq9Uep1aMbuWePtw@mail.gmail.com>	<87twu5nmbp.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
	<55DBB3B8.9080807@redhat.com>	<55F839BC.8060409@redhat.com>
	<20150915155435.GC23145@redhat.com>
	<87h9mvac06.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
In-Reply-To: <87h9mvac06.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] Add .dir-locals.el file to configure
 emacs coding style
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

15.09.2015 19:22, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
[]
>> Personally I be fine with both the minimal approach or the more
>> comprehensive approach of Peter's, but I'd probably tend towards
>> the minimal approach to avoid the warnings problem.
> 
> Seconded.
> 
> The "minimal approach" has been on the list since June, and it has my
> R-by.  It's clearly better than nothing.  Let's commit it now.  We can
> always improve on it later.

Ok, let's apply it.  BTW, Marcus, your R-By wasn't actually clear,
to which version it applies.  Now I see that after your comment.

Applied, finally, to -trivial now, thank you all!

Should I add some more r-by or s-by? :)

Thanks!

/mjt