From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935045AbbI2QgT (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:36:19 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:53928 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932194AbbI2QgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Sep 2015 12:36:09 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,608,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="306877276" Message-ID: <560ABDF6.1090804@citrix.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:36:06 +0100 From: David Vrabel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julien Grall , CC: , , , , , , Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/20] xen/arm64: Add support for 64KB page in Linux References: <1441640038-23615-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <560ABBFA.6070902@citrix.com> <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29/09/15 17:33, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi David, > > On 29/09/15 17:27, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 07/09/15 16:33, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> A branch based on the latest xentip/for-linus-4.3 can be found here: >>> >>> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/julieng/linux-arm.git branch xen-64k-v4 >> >> This has too many conflicts with the >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git for-linus-4.4 >> branch. >> >> Please rebase. > > I was about to send a new version rebased (no changes in it so far > except for rebasing purpose). I will do it on top of for-linus-4.4. > I will also include the swiotlb changes at the end as it was reviewed by > Stefano. Thanks. > BTW, some of the patches should, strictly speaking, go via the block and > network subsystem. Although, they heavily depends on other patches in > this series. Would it be fine to send all through xentip? Yes, if they've been acked by the appropriate maintainer. David From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david.vrabel@citrix.com (David Vrabel) Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:36:06 +0100 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/20] xen/arm64: Add support for 64KB page in Linux In-Reply-To: <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com> References: <1441640038-23615-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com> <560ABBFA.6070902@citrix.com> <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com> Message-ID: <560ABDF6.1090804@citrix.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 29/09/15 17:33, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi David, > > On 29/09/15 17:27, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 07/09/15 16:33, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> A branch based on the latest xentip/for-linus-4.3 can be found here: >>> >>> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/julieng/linux-arm.git branch xen-64k-v4 >> >> This has too many conflicts with the >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git for-linus-4.4 >> branch. >> >> Please rebase. > > I was about to send a new version rebased (no changes in it so far > except for rebasing purpose). I will do it on top of for-linus-4.4. > I will also include the swiotlb changes at the end as it was reviewed by > Stefano. Thanks. > BTW, some of the patches should, strictly speaking, go via the block and > network subsystem. Although, they heavily depends on other patches in > this series. Would it be fine to send all through xentip? Yes, if they've been acked by the appropriate maintainer. David