From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Drozdov Subject: Re: [net-next,1/2] net: Set sk_txhash from a random number Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:14:10 +0300 Message-ID: <56680D02.6080403@gmail.com> References: <1438124526-2129341-2-git-send-email-tom@herbertland.com> <566695D6.6060603@gmail.com> <1449580559.7632.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Kernel Team To: Tom Herbert , Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:35465 "EHLO mail-lb0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751604AbbLILOR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 06:14:17 -0500 Received: by lbpu9 with SMTP id u9so27688096lbp.2 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 03:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 08.12.2015 19:33, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:15 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> There never has been such guarantee. Even rx hashes for a single TCP >> flow can differ, if packets are received on two different NIC with >> different RSSS keys. >> > +1, it is a salient property that hashes can differ in each direction > for a flow and that the hash for a flow can change over time. Thanks! I'll then try to move onto BPF fanout.