From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: fix XSA-158 fix Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 04:10:50 -0700 Message-ID: <56681A4A02000078000BD8D7@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <5668162602000078000BD8A0@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1449658943.16124.184.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a6ce6-0001Df-Qx for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 11:10:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1449658943.16124.184.camel@citrix.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> On 09.12.15 at 12:02, wrote: > On Wed, 2015-12-09 at 03:53 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> For one the uses of domu_max_order and ptdom_max_order were swapped. > >> And then gcc warns about an unused result of a __must_check function >> in the control part of a conditional expression when both other >> expressions can be determined by the compiler to produce the same value >> (see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68039), which happens >> when HAS_PASSTHROUGH is undefined (i.e. for ARM on 4.4 and older). > > Should we issue an updated 158 for all this? I guess we should, yes. Jan