From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753200AbcFJRiJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:38:09 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:39924 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751193AbcFJRiH (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:38:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <1462981062-24909-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1462981062-24909-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Cc: Sudeep Holla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vikas Sajjan , Sunil , Prashanth Prakash , Ashwin Chaugule , Al Stone , Lorenzo Pieralisi From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <575AFAF9.3020606@arm.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:38:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1462981062-24909-3-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 11/05/16 16:37, Sudeep Holla wrote: > ACPI 6.0 introduced an optional object _LPI that provides an alternate > method to describe Low Power Idle states. It defines the local power > states for each node in a hierarchical processor topology. The OSPM can > use _LPI object to select a local power state for each level of processor > hierarchy in the system. They used to produce a composite power state > request that is presented to the platform by the OSPM. > > Since multiple processors affect the idle state for any non-leaf hierarchy > node, coordination of idle state requests between the processors is > required. ACPI supports two different coordination schemes: Platform > coordinated and OS initiated. > > This patch adds initial support for Platform coordination scheme of LPI. > I have added support for autopromote states(basically skip flattening or creating composite state). I have also fixed the bug discussed in this thread with Prashant. Do you have any other feedback on this version that I incorporate before posting next version. -- Regards, Sudeep