From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [96.44.175.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E66F29CA; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 21:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FCD1280544; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:22:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1618608179; bh=HTafy4e+GSJqtI7p7iMN1ZzhJHFpizp9hDmmnnK5ZIU=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=je2lyImGRptNzo3I0z/aTLZtxCFEu9UvcKcvyt/MyPREIoLMxRVjvYqdTEG36tNwp pOAMWaGl+xJYNgXeZ55ivO/YWlDIBsi/YdzQSkgrphwSymzdqnYSzi3NMRvHeQig/o g3pHiaUtdXNYGZsqQV9J5fSwENb2CAvNWHl8bPDU= Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7H7dSgzQu9YR; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jarvis.int.hansenpartnership.com (unknown [IPv6:2601:600:8280:66d1::527]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BED691280541; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1618608178; bh=HTafy4e+GSJqtI7p7iMN1ZzhJHFpizp9hDmmnnK5ZIU=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G0MEWUxLku1yqXGB1MKIH4Kn2FFxXmE5KKv6aRJ6JUQqomu44MfBZESaKy4D0mUU8 DYGw1Bm8SpkrLJwZ2cZ0l50t5oQqk0I8eQd+8YlIH4afbXvfouZNi3MuOqks5aOEuj GiE9M076kRgqgCfHN2J+SYWjg/9Lr2hMY6cKESGY= Message-ID: <7be28063b8fb355fe1e73df6ca8c4db5e2163353.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: Subscriber actions for migrating lists to lists.linux.dev From: James Bottomley To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Cc: users@linux.kernel.org, tools@linux.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 14:22:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20210416211615.7serx3oa2rloe7al@nitro.local> References: <20210416211615.7serx3oa2rloe7al@nitro.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.4 X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 17:16 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 01:58:22PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > I'm fairly certain all I need to do is a bit of duplicate message > > elimination and to update my procmail rules, but on the latter, > > what is the header I should be sorting on? For current kernel.org > > lists, it's either X-Mailing-list: or List-ID: Will it be the same > > for lists.linux.dev (so I just add to the domain in the rule)? > > We still add both List-Id and X-Mailing-List headers, but as "List- > Id" is an actual RFC standard, I suggest filtering based on that. > E.g. for linux-staging@lists.linux.dev we add the following headers: > > X-Mailing-List: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev > List-Id: > List-Subscribe: > List-Unsubscribe: linux-staging+unsubscribe@lists.linux.dev> > > > Ordinarily I'd just wait and see, but given the volumes involved I > > wasn't keen on waking up to hundreds of emails suddenly in my INBOX > > instead of the list folders. > > Note, that once we get around to vger lists, we'll be preserving the > address and list-id without changes. Thanks, I like hearing "you don't have to do anything at all". > The lists we're currently migrating are moving from other places -- > either from domains we don't control (lists.01.org), or from domains > like lists.linuxfoundation.org where there are MLs that will likely > not enjoy mlmmj-style list management and will move to groups.io > instead after we cherry-pick the devel lists. OK, so for ksummit-discuss and it's ilk I need * ^List-Id: .*ksummit-discuss.lists.(linuxfoundation.org|linux.dev) And I'll be good to go. Thanks! James