All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] t4014: add tests to cover --resend option and its exclusivity
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 09:20:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82846020aedfdc5eadf5bc8349575ec1@manjaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cRBjosyadQHO03fcCz7YBc=T04ytHkpt9UU87tLaiSOgw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2024-04-17 08:48, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 11:33 PM Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> Add a few new tests to the t4014 that cover the --resend command-line 
>> option
>> for "git format-patch", which include the tests for its exclusivity 
>> with the
>> already existing -k and --rfc command-line options.
> 
> I'd recommend squashing this patch into [3/4] which introduces the
> --resend option since it's easier to review the tests when the code
> which is being tested is still fresh in one's mind. (For the same
> reason, reviewers like to see documentation added in the same patch
> which changes the code since it's easier to verify that the
> documentation matches the implementation while it's fresh in the
> mind.)

I'm fine with that.  Squashing these two patches together might also
be good for bisecting later, if need arises.

>> Signed-off-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/t/t4014-format-patch.sh b/t/t4014-format-patch.sh
>> @@ -1401,6 +1401,43 @@ test_expect_success '--rfc and -k cannot be 
>> used together' '
>> +test_expect_success '--resend' '
>> +       cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>> +       Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] header with . in it
>> +       EOF
> 
> In all of the new tests, since it's just a single line body, it could
> just as easily be created with `echo`:
> 
>     echo "Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] header with . in it" >expect &&
> 
> On the other hand, if you're following precedent in this script, then
> using a here-doc may be just fine.

I agree that using "echo ..." would be nicer.  Though, I just wanted
to follow the already existing tests for consistency, which may actually
outweigh a nicer approach.

> At any rate it's somewhat subjective and not worth a reroll.
> 
>> +       git format-patch -n -1 --stdout --resend >patch &&
>> +       grep "^Subject:" patch >actual &&
>> +       test_cmp expect actual
>> +'

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-17  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17  3:32 [PATCH 0/4] format-patch: fix an option coexistence bug and add new --resend option Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  3:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] format-patch docs: avoid use of parentheses to improve readability Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  3:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] format-patch: fix a bug in option exclusivity and add a test to t4014 Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:15   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  6:29     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:27   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-17  6:56     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-18  9:12       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:33   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17  6:40     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  7:11       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 11:38         ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17 11:48           ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:54     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 12:00     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  3:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] format-patch: new --resend option for adding "RESEND" to patch subjects Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:14   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17  6:36     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:43       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17  7:16         ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:35   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  7:05     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  7:17       ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  7:25         ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-18 20:04       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 10:02   ` Phillip Wood
2024-04-17 10:52     ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 11:31       ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17 11:34         ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 11:40           ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-17 11:43           ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 15:27     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17 17:34       ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17 21:03         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17 21:09           ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-18  3:12             ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-18 22:34               ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-19  0:08                 ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-19  0:15                 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-19  0:45                   ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-19  3:05                     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-19  2:13                   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-19  3:07                     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-19 16:21                       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17  3:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] t4014: add tests to cover --resend option and its exclusivity Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:48   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  7:20     ` Dragan Simic [this message]
2024-04-17  6:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] format-patch: fix an option coexistence bug and add new --resend option Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  6:07   ` Dragan Simic
2024-04-17  6:23     ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17  6:43       ` Dragan Simic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82846020aedfdc5eadf5bc8349575ec1@manjaro.org \
    --to=dsimic@manjaro.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.