From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7A1C433FE
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:58:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S232642AbiBXT6i (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:58:38 -0500
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33534 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S234120AbiBXT6f (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 24 Feb 2022 14:58:35 -0500
Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A59A186BB7;
        Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:58:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 809255BF;
        Thu, 24 Feb 2022 19:58:04 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 809255BF
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203;
        t=1645732684; bh=HVw2UezRrT65n15xUbRuzSJs4qGya2Y7XVmPXK4ePUs=;
        h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From;
        b=J24vHSoqtKXTkX0XKHbreOJXX8M6T4R5iQaMTNdBXNZInKPXCq81/TLB5bQyIEdQa
         8C3depVw8nYGm9nvvfdklL2yqoOmsC4wnKxah01KJLoPyiJOkAqktCzEKVJtQQjanX
         D4jFNafOnvg21idha2Jfi86MrJnGYrqduUE85BfKHvJ1JQtgTWn3vQdK1HF4pXPSB1
         lwkEm6OAC9J2XxFXTnjpl0rto1DYPTNaKCEWqzm9EkBIbRYYocha37oSv/x2YweUlm
         5vaTf8szj9YR5t9j5VjAFmbUyHIm8Rd2rQU5Lo6lKQqVwl/XNC2EzjeuuoeGGUFPqK
         bIxBCtRJha47Q==
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     workflows@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        regressions@lists.linux.dev,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] docs: add two texts covering regressions
In-Reply-To: <cover.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
References: <cover.1644994117.git.linux@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:58:03 -0700
Message-ID: <871qzskpf8.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> writes:

> "We don't cause regressions" might be the first rule of Linux kernel
> development, but it and other aspects of regressions nevertheless are hardly
> described in the Linux kernel's documentation. The following patches change
> this by creating two documents dedicated to the topic.
>
> The second patch could easily be folded into the first one, but was kept
> separate, as it might be a bit controversial. This also allows the patch
> description to explain some backgrounds for this part of the document.
> Additionally, ACKs and Reviewed-by tags can be collected separately this way.

Hearing no objections, I have applied this set, thanks.

jon