* [Buildroot] Mailing list address
@ 2015-09-14 10:35 Chris Packham
2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 12:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2015-09-14 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: buildroot
Hi All,
Just noticed that README[1] mentions "buildroot at buildroot.org" but the
buildroot website[2] says "buildroot at busybox.net". I just sent a patch
to the former, assuming it must be an alias to the latter. I haven't
seen a bounce but haven't seen it show up on the list yet.
Is the address supposed to work as I've assumed or is it just a plain
typo in README?
I'll re-send my patch to the other address in a couple of minutes.
--
[1] - http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/README#n22
[2] - http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Mailing list address
2015-09-14 10:35 [Buildroot] Mailing list address Chris Packham
@ 2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 10:58 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-09-14 22:40 ` Chris Packham
2015-09-14 12:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vicente Olivert Riera @ 2015-09-14 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: buildroot
Dear Chris Packham,
On 09/14/2015 11:35 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Just noticed that README[1] mentions "buildroot at buildroot.org" but the
> buildroot website[2] says "buildroot at busybox.net". I just sent a patch
> to the former, assuming it must be an alias to the latter.
Yes, one is an alias of the other.
> I haven't
> seen a bounce but haven't seen it show up on the list yet.
I do see your patch on the list, and also in Patchwork:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517337/
> Is the address supposed to work as I've assumed or is it just a plain
> typo in README?
No, is not a typo. The buildroot.org address works and it's the one
everyone should use, IMHO.
> I'll re-send my patch to the other address in a couple of minutes.
Now we have your patch twice:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517346/
Can you please mark this one as "superseded" or "rejected" or "not
applicable" (I guess we need a "Duplicate" option) in Patchwork?
Regards,
Vincent.
>
> --
> [1] - http://git.buildroot.net/buildroot/tree/README#n22
> [2] - http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Mailing list address
2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
@ 2015-09-14 10:58 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-09-14 22:40 ` Chris Packham
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo Zacarias @ 2015-09-14 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: buildroot
On 14/09/15 07:56, Vicente Olivert Riera wrote:
>> I haven't
>> seen a bounce but haven't seen it show up on the list yet.
>
> I do see your patch on the list, and also in Patchwork:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517337/
Hi.
That's called duplicate supression, many mail servers do that.
Since git-send-email is CCing you you've already got the message, hence
when the mailing list email arrives it's supressed because it's a duplicate.
Regards.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Mailing list address
2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 10:58 ` Gustavo Zacarias
@ 2015-09-14 22:40 ` Chris Packham
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Chris Packham @ 2015-09-14 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: buildroot
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Vicente Olivert Riera
<Vincent.Riera@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Dear Chris Packham,
>
> On 09/14/2015 11:35 AM, Chris Packham wrote:
>> I'll re-send my patch to the other address in a couple of minutes.
>
> Now we have your patch twice:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/517346/
>
> Can you please mark this one as "superseded" or "rejected" or "not
> applicable" (I guess we need a "Duplicate" option) in Patchwork?
>
Sorry for the noise. They are the same so I've marked the one without
comments as superseded.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Buildroot] Mailing list address
2015-09-14 10:35 [Buildroot] Mailing list address Chris Packham
2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
@ 2015-09-14 12:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Korsgaard @ 2015-09-14 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: buildroot
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi All,
> Just noticed that README[1] mentions "buildroot at buildroot.org" but the
> buildroot website[2] says "buildroot at busybox.net". I just sent a patch
> to the former, assuming it must be an alias to the latter. I haven't
> seen a bounce but haven't seen it show up on the list yet.
> Is the address supposed to work as I've assumed or is it just a plain
> typo in README?
It's purely a historical issue. In the beginning we didn't have
@buildroot.{org,net}, so the mailing list used @busybox.net. This has in
the mean time been fixed, but the mailman configuration is not updated
yet so it still lists @busybox.net.
I'll contact the osuosl.org guys to get that fixed, thanks for letting
us know.
--
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-14 22:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-14 10:35 [Buildroot] Mailing list address Chris Packham
2015-09-14 10:56 ` Vicente Olivert Riera
2015-09-14 10:58 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2015-09-14 22:40 ` Chris Packham
2015-09-14 12:41 ` Peter Korsgaard
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.