From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] e1000: igb and em1000 PCI Port Hotplug changes Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:04:23 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A40B47@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1434969865-10527-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: "Zhang, Helin" , "dev@dpdk.org" Return-path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB23BC56E for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:04:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhang, Helin > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:34 AM > To: Iremonger, Bernard; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v6] e1000: igb and em1000 PCI Port Hotplug changes >=20 > Hi Bernard >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Iremonger, Bernard > > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 6:44 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Zhang, Helin; Iremonger, Bernard > > Subject: [PATCH v6] e1000: igb and em1000 PCI Port Hotplug changes > > > > This patch depends on the Port Hotplug Framework. > > It implements the eth_dev_uninit functions for rte_em_pmd, > rte_igb_pmd > > and rte_igbvf_pmd. > Would it be better to split this patch into smaller patches in a patch se= t as you > did for i40e hotplug? >=20 > Regards, > Helin Hi Helin, I don't think there is anything to be gained by splitting up this patch. All the changes are hotplug related. In the case of the i40e, there are five patches which are unrelated to hotp= lug=20 which resolve issues encountered during development. =20 Regards, Bernard