From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] librte_ether: fix coverity errors in rte_eth_copy_pci_info Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:54:07 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F7DBB8@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1446827408-32393-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <15745635.HYcjktu7yu@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7805A6B for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 17:54:15 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <15745635.HYcjktu7yu@xps13> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/1] librte_ether: fix coverity errors in > rte_eth_copy_pci_info >=20 > 2015-11-06 16:30, Bernard Iremonger: > > add else branch to if statement. >=20 > I think a return statement would be more appropriate. >=20 I will add return statement instead. Regards, Bernard.