From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DCC93E for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:33:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saturn.retrosnub.co.uk (saturn.retrosnub.co.uk [178.18.118.26]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B936D196 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:33:17 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1437038344.25036.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> References: <55A1407E.5080800@oracle.com> <55A26C5B.8060007@oracle.com> <20150713105210.6e367f4b@noble> <55A33E48.2040202@oracle.com> <20150713142132.08fead4d@gandalf.local.home> <55A45AD8.5010400@oracle.com> <20150713210226.519dedfd@gandalf.local.home> <20150714104623.GQ11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A51548.4040502@oracle.com> <20150714152515.GX11162@sirena.org.uk> <55A52B8B.5060606@oracle.com> <20150714113829.4b618d9a@gandalf.local.home> <55A53074.7040109@oracle.com> <20150714120225.65e489cc@gandalf.local.home> <55A5635D.1020600@oracle.com> <20150715114946.481f154d@noble> <55A5C0EE.3060803@oracle.com> <20150715122802.56ca2100@noble> <1436955234.31121.25.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <20150716092410.22d0af07@noble> <20150715212535.754da6eb@gandalf.local.home> <1437038344.25036.21.camel@HansenPartnership.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Jonathan Cameron Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:33:12 +0100 To: James Bottomley , Steven Rostedt Message-ID: <917377B4-C9C4-4C13-9747-F1C96CEF1269@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> Cc: Sasha Levin , Linus Torvalds , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] Issues with stable process List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 16 July 2015 10:19:04 BST, James Bottomley wrote: >On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 21:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:24:10 +1000 >> NeilBrown wrote: >> >> > > I just use the rule of thumb: must be in -next for two days >because then >> > > I know 0day (and the other checkers) have also run. >> > >> > Do you *really* know that? >> > Given that there seems to be value in knowing "0day has run >> > successfully", should we ask for an interface to do exactly that? >> > >> >> There's an opt-in with Fengguang Wu's 0day tests to have it email you >> when it finishes with "SUCCESS". I have that, as I don't do pushes >for >> any patches until I see that. > >How? Is there actually some sort of interface to 0day? (/me has been >rather lazy and simply emails requests to Fengguang). Detail would be >great to share. Fengguang said back in Edinburgh to email him if you want success messages. Don't think that has changed. I emailed across the room and been getting them ever since :) As with others I hold pull requests until they come in. Jonathan > >James > > >_______________________________________________ >Ksummit-discuss mailing list >Ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org >https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ksummit-discuss -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.