From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754061AbbHDQOd (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:14:33 -0400 Received: from m12-14.163.com ([220.181.12.14]:35914 "EHLO m12-14.163.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751978AbbHDQOc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:14:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: perf eBPF patch ordering. was: Re: perf test LLVM was: Re: [GIT PULL 00/39] perf tools: filtering events using eBPF programs From: pi3orama X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143) In-Reply-To: <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:13:01 +0800 Cc: "Wangnan (F)" , He Kuang , Li Zefan , Alexei Starovoitov , Xia Kaixu , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ingo Molnar , Jiri Olsa , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: References: <20150731203125.GB16700@kernel.org> <55BED407.9090009@huawei.com> <20150803150728.GA3864@kernel.org> <20150803151905.GE3864@kernel.org> <20150803161116.GB5498@kernel.org> <20150803194917.GE5498@kernel.org> <55C04D60.2050101@huawei.com> <55C0966B.5020801@huawei.com> <20150804155557.GB3126@kernel.org> <20150804161123.GC3126@kernel.org> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo X-CM-TRANSID: DsCowECpmEGM5MBVa5s_Ag--.26521S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7XF17GFW7Gr15Ary8tr4Dtwb_yoW3JrgEyr y7Crn7Grs5Ga9Fqa9rCF47GrsrJ34DJF1jvw4rJ3yagas3XFs7ta1293ykWr17Casa9anI k3ZxJFZ2vwnIvjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU01v3UUUUUU== X-Originating-IP: [210.73.4.168] X-CM-SenderInfo: lslt02xdpdqiywtou0bp/1tbiyQ9MQFQGzS5vQAAAsU Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2015年8月5日，上午12:11，Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道： > > Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:55:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: >> Em Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:39:39PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu: > >>> https://github.com/WangNan0/linux.git ebpf > >> Ok, but I am checking patch by patch to see if the changes I made are >> kept, and for the first one, it wasn't (the second one is the cset in > > ouch, you now use a branch named "ebpf" whereas before you used > "perf/ebpf-for-acme" before, that was what I was looking at now :-\ > > After I realised that, yes, you kept my changes in the "ebpf" branch, > looking there now. > I'll remove that branch tomorrow. Thank you. > - Arnaldo