All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Ilya Faenson <ifaenson@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] BlueZ line discipline baud rate setting update
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:16:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <B95AE695-FE24-4366-86F6-545CC786DFBD@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434387007-3666-2-git-send-email-ifaenson@broadcom.com>

Hi Ilya,

> Bring the tty into a known 8 bits, 1 start bit, 1 stop bit,
> hardware flow control state with a given baud rate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Faenson <ifaenson@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> index ac87346..606cc5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c
> @@ -271,9 +271,16 @@ void hci_uart_set_baudrate(struct hci_uart *hu, unsigned int speed)
> 	struct tty_struct *tty = hu->tty;
> 	struct ktermios ktermios;
> 
> +	/* Bring the UART into a known state with a given baud rate */
> 	ktermios = tty->termios;
> 	ktermios.c_cflag &= ~CBAUD;
> -	ktermios.c_cflag |= BOTHER;
> +	ktermios.c_iflag &= ~(IGNBRK | BRKINT | PARMRK | ISTRIP | INLCR |
> +			    IGNCR | ICRNL | IXON);
> +	ktermios.c_oflag &= ~OPOST;
> +	ktermios.c_lflag &= ~(ECHO | ECHONL | ICANON | ISIG | IEXTEN);
> +	ktermios.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARENB | CBAUD);
> +	ktermios.c_cflag |= CS8;
> +	ktermios.c_cflag |= CRTSCTS;
> 	tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(&ktermios, speed, speed);

with the questions raised by the others, I think for now we just want to change the baud rate and leave the rest to a more generic function. I am fine if the kernel side wants to enforce the settings on the UART. That seems fully reasonable. However we need to give drivers a chance to let it come from userspace as well and honor whatever they configured there.

So we need to clear CBAUD and then encode the baud rate. Do we need to bother with BOTHER or is that just not needed at all. I really like to get this detail fixed as soon as possible since we are close to the merge window.

Regards

Marcel


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15 16:50 [PATCH] BlueZ line discipline baud rate setting update Ilya Faenson
2015-06-15 16:50 ` Ilya Faenson
2015-06-15 17:35   ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-06-16  8:43     ` Frederic Danis
2015-06-16 12:19       ` Ilya Faenson
2015-06-16 13:34       ` Frederic Danis
2015-06-16 14:36       ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-06-16 16:15         ` Frederic Danis
2015-06-16 16:28           ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-06-15 21:40   ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-06-15 21:45     ` Ilya Faenson
2015-06-17 13:16   ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2015-06-17 13:26     ` Ilya Faenson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=B95AE695-FE24-4366-86F6-545CC786DFBD@holtmann.org \
    --to=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=ifaenson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.