* When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
@ 2015-09-09 13:13 Manish Jaggi
2015-09-09 14:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Manish Jaggi @ 2015-09-09 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users; +Cc: mjaggi@cavium.com
Hi,
I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
Can someone please tell when would be the preempt_rt patchset be
available for 4.2
Thanks & Regards,
Manish
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-09 13:13 When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel Manish Jaggi
@ 2015-09-09 14:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-09 18:11 ` Albino B Neto
2015-09-14 11:28 ` Jaggi, Manish
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2015-09-09 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manish Jaggi; +Cc: linux-rt-users, LKML
B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
platform.
> Can someone please tell when would be the preempt_rt patchset be
> available for 4.2
Once the 5.0 RT support for zilchcore is finished.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-09 14:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2015-09-09 18:11 ` Albino B Neto
2015-09-09 20:01 ` Ralf Mardorf
2015-09-14 11:28 ` Jaggi, Manish
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Albino B Neto @ 2015-09-09 18:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Manish Jaggi, linux-rt-users, LKML
2015-09-09 11:28 GMT-03:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>:
> B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
>
> That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
> platform.
linux 5.0 kernel ?
--
Albino B Neto
www.bino.us
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-09 18:11 ` Albino B Neto
@ 2015-09-09 20:01 ` Ralf Mardorf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Mardorf @ 2015-09-09 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Albino B Neto, linux-rt-users
On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:11:41 -0300, Albino B Neto wrote:
>linux 5.0 kernel ?
The HAL 9001 already runs linux 5.2-rt-scpowers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-09 14:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-09 18:11 ` Albino B Neto
@ 2015-09-14 11:28 ` Jaggi, Manish
2015-09-14 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jaggi, Manish @ 2015-09-14 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-rt-users, LKML
__________________________________
>From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 7:58 PM
>To: Jaggi, Manish
>Cc: linux-rt-users; LKML
>Subject: Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
>
>B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
>
>That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
>platform.
>
>> Can someone please tell when would be the preempt_rt patchset be
>> available for 4.2
>
>Once the 5.0 RT support for zilchcore is finished.
>
How can I help in forward porting of the patches on 4.2
>
>Thanks,
>
> tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-14 11:28 ` Jaggi, Manish
@ 2015-09-14 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-14 17:11 ` Daniel Vacek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2015-09-14 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jaggi, Manish; +Cc: linux-rt-users, LKML
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
> >
> How can I help in forward porting of the patches on 4.2
I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
being a LTS kernel.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-14 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2015-09-14 17:11 ` Daniel Vacek
2015-09-15 1:37 ` Mike Galbraith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vacek @ 2015-09-14 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Jaggi, Manish, linux-rt-users, LKML
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> being a LTS kernel.
That's odd.
--nX
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-14 17:11 ` Daniel Vacek
@ 2015-09-15 1:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-09-15 6:49 ` Daniel Vacek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2015-09-15 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Vacek; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Jaggi, Manish, linux-rt-users, LKML
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> > being a LTS kernel.
>
> That's odd.
Not really. Maintaining rt is hard work. Try it, you'll see that it
can eat large piles of your free time. There's nothing odd about people
wanting to invest some of their free time in.. oh, say having a life.
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
2015-09-15 1:37 ` Mike Galbraith
@ 2015-09-15 6:49 ` Daniel Vacek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vacek @ 2015-09-15 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Galbraith; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Jaggi, Manish, linux-rt-users, LKML
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mike Galbraith
<umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
>> > being a LTS kernel.
>>
>> That's odd.
>
> Not really. Maintaining rt is hard work. Try it, you'll see that it
> can eat large piles of your free time. There's nothing odd about people
> wanting to invest some of their free time in.. oh, say having a life.
And what about your sense of humour, Mike? ;-)
--nX
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-15 6:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-09 13:13 When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel Manish Jaggi
2015-09-09 14:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-09 18:11 ` Albino B Neto
2015-09-09 20:01 ` Ralf Mardorf
2015-09-14 11:28 ` Jaggi, Manish
2015-09-14 11:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-14 17:11 ` Daniel Vacek
2015-09-15 1:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-09-15 6:49 ` Daniel Vacek
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.