From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 81F57E00A6A; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:33:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (daiane.list[at]gmail.com) * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.217.170 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com (mail-lb0-f170.google.com [209.85.217.170]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99D3E00A54 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lblr1 with SMTP id r1so38552894lbl.0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:32:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=smWrIwYl/J5xTqqQtatbcLZ8RkZ9A062NBby5kSEW6M=; b=YbBBnXRjyfkWAyXv8BYh/DdGuqSSEmlrv8jt/mylR3NH5ooQ2O8SWQieX41HpQdQeI fLHmNxyEUKpXBwrIG8155CnennQ5kiLJlScA5grJgiYgvulomVQT1GFo+Qc36KiRlasw Iri4dhK4JDKCQt+02KUCqXEE7Zn0MqmZ/Os/d6fo7nzoIJxxhti88Vsgbp8nyY6uDN9A JSHhBxY2IGQ6Zhd3I6j4k8FS/s7zCpDOqb0wUpnhlGXcZ8/ALw8jjlgGjF8hI8VBM7v3 YoDd4aqZjs/pb3FrXMyufIzin9xiZYiGQLOm0GpKsSF+JDieBYSroB14vS6YRJ1XvtyI sDcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.209.106 with SMTP id ml10mr9422260lbc.112.1434569577416; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: angolini@gmail.com X-Google-Sender-Delegation: angolini@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.81.106 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 12:32:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5581C98C.8060802@mail.bg> References: <1434564146-11377-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1434564146-11377-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5581BC50.5020504@mail.bg> <5581BE95.9060009@mail.bg> <5581C98C.8060802@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:32:57 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MYfCJyvERlukDhLiZcBoBNGcx7U Message-ID: From: Daiane Angolini To: Nikolay Dimitrov Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/4] linux-fslc-mx6 (3.14-1.0.x): Add recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 19:33:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Otavio, > > > On 06/17/2015 09:39 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov >> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/17/2015 09:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This recipe provides the FSL Community's i.MX6 Linux which is a Linux >>>>>> kernel based on Freescale 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA release, used by FSL >>>>>> Community BSP in order to provide support for i.MX6 based platforms. >>>>>> >>>>>> The fork includes the official Linux kernel stable updates, backported >>>>>> features and fixes coming from the vendors, kernel community or FSL >>>>>> Community itself. >>>>>> >>>>>> This version is based on 3.14.44 stable release and includes following >>>>>> changes on top of both kernels: >>>>>> >>>>>> 9e71c2c ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable kexec support >>>>>> 3b15ffa Revert "net: fec: fix the warning found by dma debug" >>>>>> 3183696 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fixup runtime PM conditions during >>>>>> ->probe() >>>>>> 434d1b2 ARM: 8338/1: kexec: Relax SMP validation to improve DT >>>>>> compatibility >>>>>> 33bb67d gpio: generic: clamp retured value to [0,1] >>>>>> 192f32d ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC >>>>>> support >>>>>> is disabled >>>>>> >>>>>> Change-Id: I0d5b21a0381c64b323c73cded73a93a4f218f50d >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador >>>>>> --- >>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig | 414 >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb | 16 + >>>>>> 2 files changed, 430 insertions(+) >>>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig >>>>>> create mode 100644 >>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I personally think that the naming of this kernel will cause confusion. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Any suggestion? >>> >>> >>> >>> Anything that doesn't contain "fslc", like "linux-fsl", "linux-imx", >>> "linux-imx6" or similar. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> >> I think it is important to provide the credit to fslc as this is not >> an fsl initiative or a generic imx kernel. > > > I think the credit already goes everywhere - source code license, > author's rights in each file, etc. To be honest, I was thinking mostly > about functionality and not about credit. I'm OK with revisiting this kernel provider naming topic. Because it's always healthy to rework or reorganize, and because it's a while (I think more than 3 years?) that we had this discussion in the past. So, I do want to hear suggestions as well. However, if this kernel provider get a name change, linux-fslc must follow the same pattern. At the end, they point to the same git repository, which is going to follow the same pattern as well. Daiane > > So, in terms of functionality this kernel sits somewhere between > mainline and FSL releases, is that correct? > > Regards, > Nikolay > > -- > _______________________________________________ > meta-freescale mailing list > meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale