From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:34283 "EHLO mail-wi0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbbINGdU (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 02:33:20 -0400 Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so125929598wic.1 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 23:33:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000701d0ee9a$ae397600$0aac6200$@net> References: <000701d0ee9a$ae397600$0aac6200$@net> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:33:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] deb-pkg: add source package From: Riku Voipio Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Doug Smythies Cc: Michal Marek , maximilian attems , Ben Hutchings , linux-kbuild , Chris J Arges On 14 September 2015 at 06:08, Doug Smythies wrote: > However, I do not understand why I now get a .change > file that I do not want. Is there some problem the presence of this file causes, or is just aesthetic issue? Some people need this file[1] for binary-only builds as well, just just dropping it isn't really good idea. > Nor do I want the 532 lines of "dpkg-genchanges" > and ""Use of uninitialized value" warnings at the end > of the compile. That is something that should be fixed. can you paste the contents of your debian/changelog after a bindeb-pkg run? Riku [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/14/261