From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757577AbbGQJgX (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:36:23 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:35026 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756149AbbGQJgV (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:36:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1434548543-22949-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1434548543-22949-5-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed From: Linus Walleij To: Tomeu Vizoso Cc: Stephen Warren , Thierry Reding , Alexandre Courbot , Mark Rutland , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Andrzej Hajda , Lv Zheng , Alexander Holler , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Moore , Grant Likely , Len Brown , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , =?UTF-8?Q?Terje_Bergstr=C3=B6m?= , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Dmitry Torokhov , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Brown , Kumar Gala , Javier Martinez Canillas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 17 July 2015 at 10:04, Linus Walleij wrote: >> I don't see Stephen's ACK on them, where is it? It's not in the >> patch and I don't see it as response to the patches. > > I see it in: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1436862596-27730-4-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com > > Which was given in: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/559D8E36.50209@wwwdotorg.org Hm strange I only see v1, that's why I'm confused.... > But we still need an ack for patch 1/3 before both 2/3 and 3/3 can be > merged, because if we don't defer the probe when the pinctrl isn't > found and just skip adding the gpio-range, there won't be no > gpio-range set at all if the pinctrl device probes after the gpiochip > device. Merging 2/3 now would be fine as long as we don't merge 3/3 > before 1/3. I'll hold it back for now, bug me when you think I can merge 1/3 and 2/3. Yours, Linus Walleij From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:36:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 04/13] pinctrl: tegra: Only set the gpio range if needed In-Reply-To: References: <1434548543-22949-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> <1434548543-22949-5-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On 17 July 2015 at 10:04, Linus Walleij wrote: >> I don't see Stephen's ACK on them, where is it? It's not in the >> patch and I don't see it as response to the patches. > > I see it in: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/1436862596-27730-4-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso at collabora.com > > Which was given in: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/g/559D8E36.50209 at wwwdotorg.org Hm strange I only see v1, that's why I'm confused.... > But we still need an ack for patch 1/3 before both 2/3 and 3/3 can be > merged, because if we don't defer the probe when the pinctrl isn't > found and just skip adding the gpio-range, there won't be no > gpio-range set at all if the pinctrl device probes after the gpiochip > device. Merging 2/3 now would be fine as long as we don't merge 3/3 > before 1/3. I'll hold it back for now, bug me when you think I can merge 1/3 and 2/3. Yours, Linus Walleij