From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9300BC433DB for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55A7233CE for ; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 17:36:10 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A55A7233CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBYLJ46HZzDqcj for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 04:36:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=google.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b; helo=mail-il1-x12b.google.com; envelope-from=benjaminfair@google.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Beo8GgC5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DBYJZ2wjmzDqZW for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 04:34:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id n9so7541442ili.0 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:34:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9y/u3J5v0uCfJk3w1CLMpUmF1Z+5XttxqBici57qTLA=; b=Beo8GgC5zisCKr9eDMITHv8wKfxbeu76Q10FUb3nffg/2fl5mhUAlKNeVpXzQ5jidn hVe+z+x/HcOzTAiiHaOJHz7vt+hsLKvmsDyLlfTLBGuqVlSW4kpHJqj+06dH5nDNuZhP KNv5F9sjsfadRTwjJitHy6T9TkmbCbmS5s8+9a4mxzCRLzwhbsDmaCoz0/rWPOf7Afgc ddoWNUuZzNLLXzVHbhGR9caSCb/cV0TL7Kj93LoxBE0TUHR5kXtP9Nt+ES2FFhNBkJ5u Ffv/9KvEseVqxFF+w1UwZRPDZTVdz3gvh1GqXZqyKGsQFDzz0WD8rnY4l+GeEAFEQEnt qGxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9y/u3J5v0uCfJk3w1CLMpUmF1Z+5XttxqBici57qTLA=; b=bdFGXaALmrBCxfTJ0F6BhMKR6mYMJq/7G2PhmXxXuZkqkcUabQc10IW2s3HpEHWaP2 /vcHjVG8QcYoYrn5gSJb81R21rkVKWT+Rl3hdfzoh4EbgLj/AWTpOdpN4gC1ewPb65hm uUoWkkMEP8AzaTtcyvnnWunsfF5WUZzaH1z4cKbKCJ/kkvzxCxt6pwQwxhJBh0QnUBpr CKtylimwlsTq6EutxYw96t18Gr3yNOr1PCtP/ik+Oa8Z4W5OyLThE68lw1mIqNegp4GV 42PoE5yrnPpnT7Nn6wxLYxsjd3ouc7q36DvjRgG5fxePx+wgPRKNe7cRTtek6+3tHQ1Y doqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GCPioM5XNQiD0QM8y7T+f4Bnbo/HZAdfgSyix9JQkCkUugyUk oHqcrd9DpDCpEvTE8ohtQP1AJ+dHEQRypR6R3thmTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPoEE6JOaQDszvXite2pIbYUPVq/suis/233EgpalMhkszIHUqdNDkKQkGfChzLGDEdVOhJ+3duGd9rI2q0qs= X-Received: by 2002:a92:6410:: with SMTP id y16mr10357265ilb.126.1610040865351; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 09:34:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2e3f9acc-cc58-6f71-2e42-e046109dd5ec@molgen.mpg.de> In-Reply-To: <2e3f9acc-cc58-6f71-2e42-e046109dd5ec@molgen.mpg.de> From: Benjamin Fair Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 09:33:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upstreaming downstream Google BMC repositories To: Paul Menzel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Brandon Kim , OpenBMC Maillist Errors-To: openbmc-bounces+openbmc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "openbmc" Hi Paul, On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 00:09, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Dear Brandon, > > > Am 07.01.21 um 02:49 schrieb Brandon Kim: > > > We're exploring ways of upstreaming some of the downstream repositories > > from Google to openbmc/* . > > > > Half, if not most of the downstream repositories are C++ daemons that are > > specific to Google so we didn't want to create a bunch of new > > openbmc/ that no one would use. > > > > An idea that Ed gave me was having something like openbmc/google-misc > > repository for all these repositories and if there are any that seem useful > > to others, we can break it out into a different, separate repository in > > openbmc/* layer. > > > > Please let me know if this seems like a good idea and I'm open to other > > suggestions! > > Thank you very much for putting in the effort to make these repositories > public. > > Using the openbmc/google-misc approach, how would the git history > (commit log) be handled? > > Personally, I would prefer having small repositories as git makes that > very easy to handle. Also it might save you time, as you do not have to > think about what to do with the git history, and do not have to merge it. We would most likely squash the history together, in case there's something confidential or private in the earlier commits. Many small repos would be easy to handle for us, but OpenBMC may not want to have lots of small Google-specific repos in their org as this may make it more cumbersome for others to find the relevant repos that they're interested in. There's also overhead for the project maintainers to create the relevant groups and permissions for each new repo. > > > Kind regards, > > Paul