From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50977)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z9z0x-00068l-3l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:08:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z9z0r-0007of-KN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:08:06 -0400
Received: from mail-vn0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:45787)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <peter.maydell@linaro.org>) id 1Z9z0r-0007oQ-Hd
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 13:08:01 -0400
Received: by vnbg7 with SMTP id g7so2553774vnb.12
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 30 Jun 2015 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2877592.aNXnatIRsp@sifl>
References: <1428670681-23032-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
	<4050262.AavIzuNMzJ@sifl> <20150630083934.GA3016@hawk.localdomain>
	<2877592.aNXnatIRsp@sifl>
From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 18:07:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFEAcA_zgwHgdhMaUkCuSynYJWoZnkrZr2a3F7mbsCyUS7YyNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3] Revert seccomp tests that allow it
 to be used on non-x86 architectures
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de>, Eduardo Otubo <eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com>, Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>, Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Karl-Philipp Richter <krichter722@aol.de>, =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>

On 30 June 2015 at 18:01, Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to wonder if the 32-bit ARM build system didn't have
> __NR_cacheflush defined in the system headers; that might explain some of the
> behavior.  Could you check your system to see if it has __NR_cacheflush
> defined (try /usr/include/asm/unistd.h)?

The constant name is __ARM_NR_cacheflush, not __NR_cacheflush
(all the ARM-specific syscalls are __ARM_NR_*). See
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h#L418

thanks
-- PMM