From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [v7][PATCH 00/16] Fix RMRR
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 15:50:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFLBxZamwHmDJhDpJxFuBh+8t15xz_aME82oxSeLF2=i==Ldyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1436420047-25356-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1436420047-25356-1-git-send-email-tiejun.chen@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> v7:

It looks like most of the libxl/libxc patches have been acked.  It
seems to me that most of the hypervisor patches (1-3, 14-15) are
either ready to go in or pretty close.

The main thing I think we're missing is the hvmloader stuff (5-7).  Is
that right?

I looked through it for subsets of patches we could usefully check in,
but it looks like the device MMIO range placement in the hvmloader
patches are pretty crucial for proper functioning, even if we're not
doing anything in particular with the memory layout (a la
strategy=host).

 -George