All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
To: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
Cc: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak@gmail.com>,
	Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>,
	 Benjamin Hahn <b.hahn@phytec.de>,
	Teresa Remmet <t.remmet@phytec.de>,
	 Yashwanth Varakala <y.varakala@phytec.de>,
	upstream@lists.phytec.de, u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] binman: fix faked optional entry handling
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:09:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFLszTgzTX=S3J2FV3caYJPr45ki6WyHLaBPe1r1h39eHcw08g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250129-binman_faked_optional-v1-4-a4534bc67cbb@phytec.de>

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 at 03:30, Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de> wrote:
>
> When having an entry that is marked as optional and is missing, the
> following output is observed:
>
>   CFGS    spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout
>   BINMAN  .binman_stamp
> Image 'image' has faked external blobs and is non-functional: tee.bin
>
> Image 'image' is missing optional external blobs but is still functional: tee-os
>
> /binman/section/fit/images/tee/tee-os (tee.bin):
>    See the documentation for your board. You may need to build Open Portable
>    Trusted Execution Environment (OP-TEE) and build with TEE=/path/to/tee.bin
>
> Some images are invalid
> make: *** [Makefile:1135: .binman_stamp] Error 103
>
> To solve this contradictory messaging, when checking the faked blob
> list, remove entries that are allowed to be missing.
>
> This also fixes the testFitFirmwareLoadables binman test:
>
> FAIL: testFitFirmwareLoadables (binman.ftest.TestFunctional.testFitFirmwareLoadables)
> Test an image with an FIT that use fit,firmware
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> AssertionError: 0 != 103
>
> This test failed due to the exposed bug when testing with faked external
> blobs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yannic Moog <y.moog@phytec.de>
> ---
>  tools/binman/control.py | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Ideally your updated tests would be in this commit.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-29 10:29 [PATCH RFC 0/6] Fix handling of optional blobs in binman Yannic Moog
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] tools: binman: ftest.py: fake ext blobs per default Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:06   ` Simon Glass
2025-02-13  7:15     ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-13 14:01       ` Simon Glass
2025-02-14  7:18         ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-14 13:48           ` Simon Glass
2025-02-17  7:07             ` Yannic Moog
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] tools: binman: ftest: pass allow_fake_blob to _DoReadFileDtb Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:09   ` Simon Glass
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] tools: binman: ftest: fix tests that require non-faked ext blobs Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:09   ` Simon Glass
2025-02-13  7:15     ` Yannic Moog
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] binman: fix faked optional entry handling Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:09   ` Simon Glass [this message]
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] binman: test: assert optional blobs don't cause non-functionality Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:07   ` Simon Glass
2025-01-29 10:29 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] binman: doc: update Optional entries Yannic Moog
2025-02-10 13:08   ` Simon Glass
2025-02-13  7:21     ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-13 14:01       ` Simon Glass
2025-02-14  7:05         ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-14 13:48           ` Simon Glass
2025-02-17  7:21             ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-17 13:13               ` Simon Glass
2025-02-18 13:15                 ` Yannic Moog
2025-02-19  0:01                   ` Simon Glass
2025-02-10 13:08 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] Fix handling of optional blobs in binman Simon Glass

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFLszTgzTX=S3J2FV3caYJPr45ki6WyHLaBPe1r1h39eHcw08g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=alpernebiyasak@gmail.com \
    --cc=b.hahn@phytec.de \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=t.remmet@phytec.de \
    --cc=tharvey@gateworks.com \
    --cc=trini@konsulko.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    --cc=upstream@lists.phytec.de \
    --cc=y.moog@phytec.de \
    --cc=y.varakala@phytec.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.