From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896B7BB3 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:31:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f48.google.com (mail-la0-f48.google.com [209.85.215.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49EBFB for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 23:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagc2 with SMTP id c2so211341613lag.3 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:31:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:31:24 -0700 Message-ID: To: Jiri Kosina Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [CORE TOPIC] services needed from kernel.org infrastructure List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote: > I think it'd be useful to have a session where maintainers could come up > with feature / improvement requests for kernel.org infrastructure and have > a subsequent discussion about whether they would be generally useful. > > Let me start with my personal wish: > > I personally would very welcome a facility that'd send out an e-mail if a > new commit is pushed to a git.kernel.org repo branch (sort of what tip-bot > and akpm's scripts are doing these days) to automatically notify the patch > author that the patch has been merged and pushed out. > > Suggested attendance: Konstantin, maintainers :) I wouldn't mind something like patchwork for lkml. Since I use gmail (sigh), it's a minor PITA to pull out patchbombs in git am-able format. --Andy