From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E1DD4E00A65; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:39:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.220.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCD9E009C5 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by padev16 with SMTP id ev16so42012654pad.0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1psXy/1ovAaMPNjSVG0pXZF1gjBFsjonRdaWbvInsXU=; b=AvGjTOfhmiqbprG18ikLclTRaI04eOdbjwlQqi0ebPrCPXVf7hIUVktkXJlDsBrqIR XK9WnVmyqHyfmqKhh5UpTs8XJYPH1+RgeqAygFtQpPT4W141T/B2u/uKQSNMEuVSPXTN Vsw289E+0vP1kfFYc9C+VhImhH3ZqhjbkE8IaJyAOE26qx9naBxUGrr315vhJTc+3B9g wsqwunnsXpmT+fv0JlDjIt94yzEFaDUhyYP9PksPl6PHhoKPWs1ZmvV8NDRnvVNs/8Ko sYE5XD7y2Trxmb0veIJ2XGMw+UOcZ/pb7xLxbXDhOXr6WpI+r0F8TjO11275UdaihnCG 0Dlg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.225.97 with SMTP id rj1mr13833651pbc.108.1434566390257; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: otavio.salvador@gmail.com Received: by 10.70.34.109 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 11:39:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5581BE95.9060009@mail.bg> References: <1434564146-11377-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1434564146-11377-3-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <5581BC50.5020504@mail.bg> <5581BE95.9060009@mail.bg> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:39:50 -0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: o04_3zAB-GbRpcEyIza74wG0kuw Message-ID: From: Otavio Salvador To: Nikolay Dimitrov Cc: meta-freescale Mailing List Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 3/4] linux-fslc-mx6 (3.14-1.0.x): Add recipe X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:39:52 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > On 06/17/2015 09:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov >> wrote: >>> >>> On 06/17/2015 09:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> This recipe provides the FSL Community's i.MX6 Linux which is a Linux >>>> kernel based on Freescale 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA release, used by FSL >>>> Community BSP in order to provide support for i.MX6 based platforms. >>>> >>>> The fork includes the official Linux kernel stable updates, backported >>>> features and fixes coming from the vendors, kernel community or FSL >>>> Community itself. >>>> >>>> This version is based on 3.14.44 stable release and includes following >>>> changes on top of both kernels: >>>> >>>> 9e71c2c ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Enable kexec support >>>> 3b15ffa Revert "net: fec: fix the warning found by dma debug" >>>> 3183696 mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fixup runtime PM conditions during >>>> ->probe() >>>> 434d1b2 ARM: 8338/1: kexec: Relax SMP validation to improve DT >>>> compatibility >>>> 33bb67d gpio: generic: clamp retured value to [0,1] >>>> 192f32d ARM: imx6sl: Disable imx6sl-specific code when imx6sl SOC >>>> support >>>> is disabled >>>> >>>> Change-Id: I0d5b21a0381c64b323c73cded73a93a4f218f50d >>>> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador >>>> --- >>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig | 414 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb | 16 + >>>> 2 files changed, 430 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6/defconfig >>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-fslc-mx6_3.14-1.0.x.bb >>> >>> >>> >>> I personally think that the naming of this kernel will cause confusion. >> >> >> Any suggestion? > > > Anything that doesn't contain "fslc", like "linux-fsl", "linux-imx", > "linux-imx6" or similar. > > What do you think? I think it is important to provide the credit to fslc as this is not an fsl initiative or a generic imx kernel. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750