From: Matej Vido <matejvido@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: DPDK 2.2 roadmap
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:37:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPb1KsRvvBmKYFHhWs2d3Z4QWy6FY0da-SeMD2TROUHuPud28g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1506892.aumOHkkchj@xps13>
Hi,
2015-09-14 16:02 GMT+02:00 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-09-14 15:44, Matej Vido:
> > CESNET would like to submit new virtual poll mode driver for COMBO-80G
> and
> > COMBO-100G cards. This PMD requires libsze2 library and kernel modules
> > (combov3, szedata2_cv3) to be installed.
>
> The name of the driver was szedata2, right?
> What is the meaning? Why not having liberouter in its name?
>
SZE is our Straight ZEro copy technology for fast data transfers between
hardware and RAM, 2 is its second version, _cv3 denotes compatibility with
our third generation of FPGA cards. Liberouter is the name of our team,
which does also other, non-hardware stuff.
In the future we want to rewrite this PMD to be independent on sze library
and kernel modules - that could also further improve performance a little.
>
> > We have already sent a patch serie in June
> > (http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-June/019736.html ), but missed
> > previous merge window. Now, we are working on a new patchset version with
> > scattered packets support.
>
> Please try to split the patches in order to ease the review.
> One feature per patch is a good rule.
>
> > Meanwhile, we have improved the firmware and would like to share the
> > results of our benchmark:
> https://www.liberouter.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/pmd_szedata2_dpdk_measurement-2015-09-11.pdf
>
> Nice results!
>
> Thanks
>
Regards,
Matej
--
Matej Vido,
CESNET, a. l. e.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-14 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 13:44 DPDK 2.2 roadmap Matej Vido
2015-09-14 14:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-14 15:37 ` Matej Vido [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-09-09 8:44 Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-09 12:56 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-09-10 12:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-10 13:26 ` Thomas F Herbert
2015-09-10 19:27 ` Flavio Leitner
2015-09-10 19:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-11 1:23 ` Yuanhan Liu
2015-09-11 8:08 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-09-14 8:40 ` Zhang, Helin
2015-09-14 8:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-09-15 20:11 ` Olga Shern
2015-09-09 17:48 ` Patel, Rashmin N
2015-09-09 18:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-09-15 9:16 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPb1KsRvvBmKYFHhWs2d3Z4QWy6FY0da-SeMD2TROUHuPud28g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=matejvido@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.