All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag
@ 2015-06-11 10:14 Abdul, Hussain (H.)
  2015-06-11 14:36 ` gregkh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Abdul, Hussain (H.) @ 2015-06-11 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, vthakkar1994@gmail.com,
	hamohammed.sa@gmail.com, tapaswenipathak@gmail.com
  Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.

Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@visteon.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
 				rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
 	retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
 					synaptics_rmi4_irq,
-					platformdata->irq_type,
+					platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
 					DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
 	if (retval) {
 		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag
  2015-06-11 10:14 [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag Abdul, Hussain (H.)
@ 2015-06-11 14:36 ` gregkh
  2015-06-12  6:47   ` Abdul, Hussain (H.)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2015-06-11 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Abdul, Hussain (H.)
  Cc: vthakkar1994@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
	tapaswenipathak@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@visteon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
>  				rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
>  	retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
>  					synaptics_rmi4_irq,
> -					platformdata->irq_type,
> +					platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>  					DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
>  	if (retval) {
>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",

Have you tested this?  This changes the behavior of the code, right?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag
  2015-06-11 14:36 ` gregkh
@ 2015-06-12  6:47   ` Abdul, Hussain (H.)
  2015-06-12 15:36     ` gregkh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Abdul, Hussain (H.) @ 2015-06-12  6:47 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
  Cc: vthakkar1994@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
	tapaswenipathak@gmail.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 11 June 2015 08:06 PM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
>> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@visteon.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
>> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
>>  				rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
>>  	retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
>>  					synaptics_rmi4_irq,
>> -					platformdata->irq_type,
>> +					platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>  					DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
>>  	if (retval) {
>>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
> Have you tested this?  This changes the behavior of the code, right?
>
Greg,

I haven't tested this changes. Yes, this will change the behavior of the code.

Thanks
Abdul

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag
  2015-06-12  6:47   ` Abdul, Hussain (H.)
@ 2015-06-12 15:36     ` gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2015-06-12 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Abdul, Hussain (H.)
  Cc: vthakkar1994@gmail.com, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tapaswenipathak@gmail.com

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 06:47:25AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
> On Thursday 11 June 2015 08:06 PM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Abdul, Hussain (H.) wrote:
> >> This patch add IRQF_ONESHOT flag in threaded IRQs request without a primary handler.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Abdul Hussain <habdul@visteon.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> >> index 0f524bb..7caaae0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/ste_rmi4/synaptics_i2c_rmi4.c
> >> @@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ static int synaptics_rmi4_probe
> >>  				rmi4_data->number_of_interrupt_register);
> >>  	retval = request_threaded_irq(client->irq, NULL,
> >>  					synaptics_rmi4_irq,
> >> -					platformdata->irq_type,
> >> +					platformdata->irq_type | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >>  					DRIVER_NAME, rmi4_data);
> >>  	if (retval) {
> >>  		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unable to get attn irq %d\n",
> > Have you tested this?  This changes the behavior of the code, right?
> >
> Greg,
> 
> I haven't tested this changes. Yes, this will change the behavior of the code.

Then I can't accept this, sorry.  Why would you make a behavior change
without testing something?

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-12 15:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-11 10:14 [PATCH] staging: ste_rmi4: Add IRQF_ONESHOT flag Abdul, Hussain (H.)
2015-06-11 14:36 ` gregkh
2015-06-12  6:47   ` Abdul, Hussain (H.)
2015-06-12 15:36     ` gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.