All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Ottaviano <andrew_o1995@live.com>
To: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Rebase Question
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 00:06:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR07MB59526F40B255183931649AD19C529@MN2PR07MB5952.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

Hello all! 
 
I’ve used git for a few years now and I
think it is an amazing tool! Thank you for your hard work in
developing/maintaining it! I really appreciate it! 
 
I have a question. Let’s say that my
colleague and I branch off of master and are working. Let’s say I’m 5 commits
ahead of master and my colleague merges in ahead of me. The logical thing in my
mind is to rebase off of master. The difficulty with this is that if I have
merge conflicts that show up on my first commit, I have to resolve that stupid
thing for every subsequent commit. I could squash, but then I loose branch
history, so I don’t really want to do that. I could rebase in interactive mode,
but if I recall, I still need to resolve all the conflicts on every commit
before it squashes. 
 
The solution that I thought of is instead
of resolving conflicts from the bottom up (starting with earliest history),
resolving from the top down (latest to earliest) and resolving the conflict in
the commit it occurred. If that doesn’t work (or I guess it might be the same
as a merge of master into my branch), then couldn’t git at least store the
conflict resolution? 
 
Maybe I’m silly for asking this question,
I just really like rebase because it is so clean and this is my one frustration
with this method. 


Thanks for humoring me 😊 
Andrew Ottaviano 

             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12  0:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  0:06 Andrew Ottaviano [this message]
2021-05-12  0:23 ` Rebase Question Jacob Keller
2021-05-12  0:29 ` Bryan Turner
2021-05-12  0:44   ` Jeff King
2021-05-12  6:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2021-05-12  7:23 ` Felipe Contreras
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-11 19:57 rebase question Ryan Sun
2011-03-13  1:05 ` Martin von Zweigbergk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR07MB59526F40B255183931649AD19C529@MN2PR07MB5952.namprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=andrew_o1995@live.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.