From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94FB12F83 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 06:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E837161F; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:16:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:16:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=p8ffhKIxmEkpSnDgHOa3giAINWk QGT5aWRZ5bF8+wIE=; b=U2XiNZoy1YirjJvLt4IuOI9DhhrdxDc8LTL3x3eNDQR TR8icV4dThNEcclSE5RDqeprVrdzzCuAiWcE6tdKFMjIdzvEdoNdsq4d7aArF2re 7FSdqPjbnqy8bdHzcXIxzt2jW4wbsrXMShvQ7R7n/yhaSv1ucX4qC7k/FsPRlRKQ aLPYmULfow1qwmJxcaCSUItSpRbiExjhTFnCTVC+xTx7FSLpebHneyDBddokjVUC irMJ/ye3nwHmdliSQDhXZaW0avVqDOjPPN2nqbB8QtCjaAFTCJikxzt2wXwtZaoH /pVCTJrTUuFfmgAEBSjxlUBV6Pj/17GuEABMffa9fKQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=p8ffhK IxmEkpSnDgHOa3giAINWkQGT5aWRZ5bF8+wIE=; b=FcEzsioe2ym5VF3YZunmwi dQw03xyoaEMOvwTqHbAaYt8t5Su7aeRBql+qm+9aGDCLJEu0SeiuX6nyoMSHPAcP IlAzGvCLLmEINjn/58Pw/TAkjxfIjfDeuFl8NKcYhq7yELmpxWAVpXzXnZQ75mmS QBSfPLCA9Dzr73ffWnEGWaF84hozNBnX+1n6MgtaIJybnIkKZwEDQqXhRrGJORAF xuvSgQlnzS2JFZjcHSCjWauzkZAi7I9luwAAw2mUPMYA8CXR3eftcoXrmXT+hfWt RikwsOyumcZu2NyHnxG2ZjL8ibVYNq5iRlYD7yxScdFnAn6lAGK1q7Uqx9SqkPsg == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdduuddguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghg ucfmjfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveeuhe ejgfffgfeivddukedvkedtleelleeghfeljeeiueeggeevueduudekvdetnecukfhppeek fedrkeeirdejgedrieegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73D6F240066; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 02:16:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:15:34 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Mark Brown , Mike Rapoport , Leon Romanovsky , James Bottomley , ksummit@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Rethinking the acceptance policy for "trivial" patches Message-ID: References: <20210422124023.GD4572@sirena.org.uk> <20210422132339.GF4572@sirena.org.uk> <20210422111939.0c555039@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailing-List: ksummit@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210422111939.0c555039@gandalf.local.home> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:19:39AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:23:39 +0100 > Mark Brown wrote: > > > > For me the most annoying is to get several patches from the middle of a > > > series. IMHO, sending at least cover letter to everyone is the bare minimum > > > so that people at least can take a look at high level details and request a > > > repost. > > > > Yes, the cover letter should always go to everyone. > > And that's still the one thing that quilt send-mail does not support :-p 'git format-patch --cover-letter' also does not seem to support this, so what tool does? thanks, greg k-h