From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AABC433B4 for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EF85613BD for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:44:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3EF85613BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45946 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgq63-0005pZ-4P for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:44:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgq5N-000575-QQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:43:43 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:55089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgq5H-0003yb-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:43:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620830615; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tVfucgCLLlV/EzI5p2q0s1UZnfF23nSSRumtRrtdvAk=; b=KDqSqd4TyI3q48UsIVK2y9Xad7meC0i07V7q91EjqYSMXu9ve7kXKqiR4iFynpBtPIbKMU eC7g0jrRQ0FU9reXw5awZDMW437zR8lj6xA1XUchWJ9p9ePeei4K5OoRtNKVGU3HQubDnu X9+bYeGocY7M9vpS802mwOWPqxvhI7k= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-502-xIRO_6j3NZulgRR_qtpf5A-1; Wed, 12 May 2021 10:43:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xIRO_6j3NZulgRR_qtpf5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8425681840C; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-114-167.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.167]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE70D6091A; Wed, 12 May 2021 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 15:43:15 +0100 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] configure: bump min required CLang to 7.0.0 / XCode 10.2 Message-ID: References: <20210511132641.1022161-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20210511132641.1022161-13-berrange@redhat.com> <0e2fce4c-c8fb-de53-7529-93e8a9d667b7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0e2fce4c-c8fb-de53-7529-93e8a9d667b7@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.6 (2021-03-06) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.7, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Thomas Huth , Stefan Weil , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta , Willian Rampazzo , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 04:10:03PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 5/12/21 2:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 01:44:51PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > >> On 5/11/21 3:26 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >>> Several distros have been dropped since the last time we bumped the > >>> minimum required CLang version. > >>> > >>> Per repology, currently shipping versions are: > >>> > >>> RHEL-8: 10.0.1 > >>> Debian Stretch: 7.0.1 > >>> Debian Buster: 7.0.1 > >>> openSUSE Leap 15.2: 9.0.1 > >>> Ubuntu LTS 18.04: 10.0.0 > >>> Ubuntu LTS 20.04: 11.0.0 > >>> FreeBSD 12: 8.0.1 > >>> Fedora 33: 11.0.0 > >>> Fedora 34: 11.1.0 > >>> > >>> With this list Debian Stretch is the constraint at 7.0.1 > >>> > >>> An LLVM version of 7.0.1 corresponds to macOS XCode version of 10.2 > >>> which dates from March 2019. > >> > >> But we still rely on Travis-CI (Ubuntu Bionic 18.04 LTS) > >> for non-x86 targets until we have figured out who is willing > >> to share/maintain such non-x86 native runners on Gitlab. > >> > >> There: > >> > >> $ clang --version > >> clang version 6.0.0-1ubuntu2 (tags/RELEASE_600/final) > >> > >> If we don't use Travis-CI, then your patch is fine, but we > >> need a previous patch removing .travis.yml. > > > > Bioic has clang 10 available so not sure why you're seeing > > version 6 there > > > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/clang-10 > > But only i386/amd64 are listed there. > > However s390x is indeed in the bionic-updates stream: > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic-updates/clang-10 Never mind, lets just stick as 6.0.0 for min clang. There's no reason why we /must/ pick 7.0.0 - it is just what i thought was the min across our distros. I didn't realize ubuntu had multiple streams for clang. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|